mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

JRDB-AVR: An Active Visual Reasoning Benchmark for Embodied Agents in Real-World Environments

arXiv 2609.35032 ↗First posted 28 Sep 2026cs.AI cs.CV cs.ROcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

In complex embodied visual reasoning scenarios, an agent often has only a limited field of view, and the evidence needed to answer a question may be distributed across time, viewpoint, and interacting objects. A model may therefore give a plausible answer without ever observing the relevant object, time, or view that supports it. Current visual reasoning benchmarks largely evaluate passive observations and final answers, overlooking settings that require active reasoning and evidence acquisition. We introduce JRDB-AVR, a benchmark derived from existing real-world JRDB robotics data through a structured question-generation engine that turns this gap into an explicit evaluation: an embodied agentic system receives a visual reasoning question, requests bounded observations by timestamp and viewing angle, and is evaluated on both the final answer and the grounded visual evidence supporting it. The benchmark contains diverse questions over multiple real-world environments involving temporal search, viewpoint selection, and human-oriented compositional reasoning. We also introduce JRDB-AVR-Agent, a reference active reasoning agentic method that maintains an explicit observation-grounded graph-based world model and answers through solving. Experiments reveal a substantial gap between answer accuracy and evidence accuracy in current baselines, showing that current VLMs can produce unsupported correct answers and that active evidence-aware evaluation is necessary for embodied visual reasoning. Code and benchmark are available at https://github.com/ControlNet/JRDB-AVR.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 23 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2026.

Builds on

23 of 63 references.

References · 23

  1. 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,137
  2. 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,587
  3. 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,234
  4. 2025Qwen3-VL Technical Reportcited by 2,793
  5. 2023MiniGPT-4: Enhancing Vision-Language Understanding with Advanced Large Language Modelscited by 2,711
  6. 2023HuggingGPT: Solving AI Tasks with ChatGPT and its Friends in Hugging Facecited by 1,190
  7. 2023ViperGPT: Visual Inference via Python Execution for Reasoningcited by 603
  8. 2023ToRA: A Tool-Integrated Reasoning Agent for Mathematical Problem Solvingcited by 282
  9. 2024VideoTree: Adaptive Tree-based Video Representation for LLM Reasoning on Long Videoscited by 251
  10. 2025MindCube: Spatial Mental Modeling from Limited Viewscited by 95
  11. 2025VTool-R1: VLMs Learn to Think with Images via Reinforcement Learning on Multimodal Tool Usecited by 90
  12. 2024DrVideo: Document Retrieval Based Long Video Understandingcited by 65
11 more
  1. 2025Explain Before You Answer: A Survey on Compositional Visual Reasoningcited by 28
  2. 2025Zoom-Refine: Boosting High-Resolution Multimodal Understanding via Localized Zoom and Self-Refinementcited by 18
  3. 2025Unleashing the Potential of Multimodal LLMs for Zero-Shot Spatio-Temporal Video Groundingcited by 9
  4. 2023JRDB-Traj: A Dataset and Benchmark for Trajectory Forecasting in Crowdscited by 4
  5. 2025An Empirical Study on How Video-LLMs Answer Video Questionscited by 4
  6. 2026VIEW2SPACE: Studying Multi-View Visual Reasoning from Sparse Observationscited by 3
  7. 2025Probabilistic Active Goal Recognitioncited by 2
  8. 2025Memory-Anchored Multimodal Reasoning for Explainable Video Forensicscited by 2
  9. 2026JRDB-Pose3D: A Multi-person 3D Human Pose and Shape Estimation Dataset for Roboticscited by 1
  10. 2026Mini-BEHAVIOR-Gran: Revealing U-Shaped Effects of Instruction Granularity on Language-Guided Embodied Agentscited by 1
  11. 2026What We Talk About When We Talk About LLM Planning: Evidence for Two Distinct Planning Abilitiescited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025JRDB-Reasoning: A Difficulty-Graded Benchmark for Visual Reasoning in Robotics
  2. 2026ERQA-Plus: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Reasoning in Embodied AI
  3. 2025PhysVLM-AVR: Active Visual Reasoning for Multimodal Large Language Models in Physical Environments
  4. 2025EmbodiedVSR: Dynamic Scene Graph-Guided Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Visual Spatial Tasks
  5. 2025VisualTrans: A Benchmark for Real-World Visual Transformation Reasoning
  6. 2026FAST-EQA: Efficient Embodied Question Answering with Global and Local Region Relevancy
  7. 2026AgentVidBench: A Multi-Hop Video Question Answering Benchmark for Evaluating MLLM Agents
  8. 2025Embodied-Reasoner: Synergizing Visual Search, Reasoning, and Action for Embodied Interactive Tasks