mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

GeoCFM: Positive-Only Conditional Flow Matching for Mineral Occurrence Sampling

arXiv 2609.34398 ↗First posted 28 Sep 2026cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: Diffusion models → Flow matching, time series and science

Abstract (arXiv)

Critical mineral discovery is a positive-only problem: deposits are observed as sparse locations, while unlabeled regions are not reliable negatives, and similar geophysical signatures can arise from different subsurface states. We therefore model mineral targeting as learning a conditional spatial distribution over occurrence locations, π(pmid d), given geo-images d, rather than predicting a deterministic per-pixel score map. We introduce GeoCFM, a conditional flow-matching model that generates mineral occurrence point sets conditioned on multi-channel geo-images; GeoCFM learns a point-wise transport field in ℝ2, using UNet features with point-conditioned velocity prediction to bridge dense rasters and sparse supervision without pseudo-negatives. On a synthetic magnetics--geochemistry benchmark with latent activation and on USGS Earth MRI data with a spatially disjoint tile split, GeoCFM improves geometric agreement with observed occurrences over score-map and non-conditional baselines, while representing epistemic uncertainty through conditional sampling.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Flow matching, time series and science, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 11 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2026.

Builds on

11 of 36 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Attention-Guided Flow-Matching for Sparse 3D Geological Generation7 Apr
  2. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modeling6 Oct

Other references · 9

  1. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
  2. 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 8,964
  3. 2019PointFlow: 3D Point Cloud Generation with Continuous Normalizing Flowscited by 487
  4. 2019PointRend: Image Segmentation as Renderingcited by 439
  5. 2018Learning from positive and unlabeled data: a surveycited by 218
  6. 2017Positive-Unlabeled Learning with Non-Negative Risk Estimatorcited by 217
  7. 2016Mixture Proportion Estimation via Kernel Embedding of Distributionscited by 67
  8. 2016Class-prior Estimation for Learning from Positive and Unlabeled Datacited by 46
  9. 2018Beyond the Selected Completely At Random Assumption for Learning from Positive and Unlabeled Datacited by 36

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024DAWN-FM: Data-Aware and Noise-Informed Flow Matching for Solving Inverse Problems
  2. 2025Synthetic Geology: Structural Geology Meets Deep Learning
  3. 2026Fast and Faithful: Principled Conditional Flow Matching for Inverse Problems
  4. 2026Joint 3D Gravity and Magnetic Inversion via Rectified Flow and Ginzburg-Landau Guidance
  5. 2025Generative Latent Diffusion Model for Inverse Modeling and Uncertainty Analysis in Geological Carbon Sequestration
  6. 2026Noise-Robust Conditional Flow Matching: Generating Clean Samples from Noisy Datasets
  7. 2026Probabilistic Geodesic Flow Matching on Location-Scale Families
  8. 2024MineAgent: Towards Remote-Sensing Mineral Exploration with Multimodal Large Language Models