Coherence-Aware Distributional Evaluation of Open-Ended Text Generation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Existing open-ended generation metrics measure likelihood, lexical diversity, or distributional similarity in generic representation space, yet can miss fundamental dimensions of quality. A prominent blind spot is global coherence: a generated passage may be locally fluent while remaining globally contradictory, causally inconsistent, or topically disconnected. We identify representation as a central bottleneck in detecting these failures and introduce CHORD (Coherence-aware Hidden-state Open-generation Reference Distance), a coherence-sensitive distributional metric. CHORD encodes generated and human-written corpora in the hidden-state space of a frozen LLM using a coherence-eliciting prompt, and compares the resulting distributions using RBF-MMD. To test coherence sensitivity and selectivity, we construct a counterfactual evaluation suite pairing graded coherence-degrading perturbations with meaning-preserving controls. CHORD selectively detects relation, discourse, structural, and mixture failures that perplexity, entropy, MAUVE, FBD, and MMD-based baselines either miss or cannot separate from benign rewriting. Factorial ablations show that representation is the primary source of coherence sensitivity, while RBF-MMD improves sample efficiency. Larger backbones capture finer-grained distinctions, but coherence prompting improves selectivity only when the backbone can follow the prompt. On unconditional generation and prefix continuation, CHORD yields model rankings that strongly align with human judgments of whether outputs make sense and appear human-written. Together, these results establish representation design as central to reliable distributional evaluation. Code: https://github.com/MAPS-research/CHORD. Experiments: https://github.com/MAPS-research/CHORD-Experiment.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2026.
Builds on
38 of 60 references.
References · 38
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
- 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 2,992
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
- 2020MiniLM: Deep Self-Attention Distillation for Task-Agnostic Compression of Pre-Trained Transformerscited by 1,414
26 more
- 2025Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Modelscited by 1,175
- 2024Simple and Effective Masked Diffusion Language Modelscited by 800
- 2021BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generationcited by 719
- 2023Discrete Diffusion Modeling by Estimating the Ratios of the Data Distributioncited by 712
- 2023Towards General Text Embeddings with Multi-stage Contrastive Learningcited by 705
- 2020SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluationcited by 666
- 2024TinyLlama: An Open-Source Small Language Modelcited by 604
- 2018Texygen: A Benchmarking Platform for Text Generation Modelscited by 484
- 2021MAUVE: Measuring the Gap Between Neural Text and Human Text using Divergence Frontierscited by 466
- 2023Improving Text Embeddings with Large Language Modelscited by 295
- 2022Towards a Unified Multi-Dimensional Evaluator for Text Generationcited by 264
- 2024PKU-SafeRLHF: Towards Multi-Level Safety Alignment for LLMs with Human Preferencecited by 252
- 2023Scaling Sentence Embeddings with Large Language Modelscited by 83
- 2020UNION: An Unreferenced Metric for Evaluating Open-ended Story Generationcited by 60
- 2022On the Blind Spots of Model-Based Evaluation Metrics for Text Generationcited by 48
- 2022DiscoScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT and Discourse Coherencecited by 35
- 2022MAUVE Scores for Generative Models: Theory and Practicecited by 34
- 2026Representation Fr'echet Loss for Visual Generationcited by 32
- 2022CTRLEval: An Unsupervised Reference-Free Metric for Evaluating Controlled Text Generationcited by 29
- 2016Neural Net Models for Open-Domain Discourse Coherencecited by 23
- 2021Assessing Dialogue Systems with Distribution Distancescited by 16
- 2024Meta-Task Prompting Elicits Embeddings from Large Language Modelscited by 15
- 2026Generative Frontiers: Why Evaluation Matters for Diffusion Language Modelscited by 14
- 2026Perplexity Cannot Always Tell Right from Wrongcited by 8
- 2022Distribution Aware Metrics for Conditional Natural Language Generationcited by 6
- 2026Hacking Generative Perplexity: Why Unconditional Text Evaluation Needs Distributional Metricscited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.