mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Explainable Deep Learning of Resting-State Functional Connectomes Reveals Network Biomarkers of Adolescent Intelligence

arXiv 2609.33422 ↗First posted 27 Sep 2026q-bio.NC cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Mapping resting-state brain organization to individual differences in cognitive ability remains a major challenge in population neuroinformatics. Although deep learning enables flexible modeling of brain connectivity, limited interpretability restricts its scientific and clinical utility. To address this objective, we developed an explainable deep learning framework based on sparse projected residual networks to predict fluid, crystallized, and total intelligence from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging in 5,285 participants from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study. We incorporated three complementary explainability methods (Integrated Gradients, Gradient Shapley Additive Explanations, and Occlusion) to interpret model behavior. The framework outperformed existing approaches, achieving Pearson correlations of 0.44, 0.58, and 0.56 for fluid, crystallized, and total intelligence, respectively, corresponding to predictive improvements of 6 to 9 percent. All three explainability methods produced near-identical feature rankings (pairwise rank correlations greater than 0.99). Consensus maps revealed a dual-layered functional architecture where primary predictive hubs localized within canonical systems, while the strongest global predictive pathways frequently bypassed these hubs through distributed, long-range relay connections. These findings suggest that intelligence emerges from the interaction between localized computational hubs and distributed communication pathways. Ultimately, these normative network architectures provide clinical reference maps to detect individual deviations, supporting earlier diagnosis, cognitive subtype stratification, and treatment monitoring in atypical neurodevelopment.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2026.

Builds on

10 of 41 references.

References · 10

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  3. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,455
  4. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
  5. 2018Deeper Insights into Graph Convolutional Networks for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,099
  6. 2019Measuring and Relieving the Over-smoothing Problem for Graph Neural Networks from the Topological Viewcited by 544
  7. 2021Graph Autoencoders for Embedding Learning in Brain Networks and Major Depressive Disorder Identificationcited by 15
  8. 2023Brain Networks and Intelligence: A Graph Neural Network Based Approach to Resting State fMRI Datacited by 12
  9. 2024Beyond Over-smoothing: Uncovering the Trainability Challenges in Deep Graph Neural Networkscited by 10
  10. 2022Accounting for Temporal Variability in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Improves Prediction of Intelligencecited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.