Accounting for Temporal Variability in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Improves Prediction of Intelligence
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neuroimaging-based prediction methods for intelligence and cognitive abilities have seen a rapid development in literature. Among different neuroimaging modalities, prediction based on functional connectivity (FC) has shown great promise. Most literature has focused on prediction using static FC, but there are limited investigations on the merits of such analysis compared to prediction based on dynamic FC or region level functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) times series that encode temporal variability. To account for the temporal dynamics in fMRI data, we propose a deep neural network involving bi-directional long short-term memory (bi-LSTM) approach that also incorporates feature selection mechanism. The proposed pipeline is implemented via an efficient GPU computation framework and applied to predict intelligence scores based on region level fMRI time series as well as dynamic FC. We compare the prediction performance for different intelligence measures based on static FC, dynamic FC, and region level time series acquired from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study involving close to 7000 individuals. Our detailed analysis illustrates that static FC consistently has inferior prediction performance compared to region level time series or dynamic FC for unimodal rest and task fMRI experiments, and in almost all cases using a combination of task and rest features. In addition, the proposed bi-LSTM pipeline based on region level time series identifies several shared and differential important brain regions across task and rest fMRI experiments that drive intelligence prediction. A test-retest analysis of the selected features shows strong reliability across cross-validation folds. Given the large sample size from ABCD study, our results provide strong evidence that superior prediction of intelligence can be achieved by accounting for temporal variations in fMRI.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 82 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Nov 2022.
Builds on
7 of 82 references.
References · 7
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2016Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmaxcited by 2,739
- 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,417
- 2016The Concrete Distribution: A Continuous Relaxation of Discrete Random Variablescited by 1,148
- 2017Learning Sparse Neural Networks through L0 Regularizationcited by 583
- 2019Analyzing Dynamical Brain Functional Connectivity As Trajectories on Space of Covariance Matricescited by 9
- 2018Monte-Carlo Sampling applied to Multiple Instance Learning for Histological Image Classificationcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2023Brain Networks and Intelligence: A Graph Neural Network Based Approach to Resting State fMRI Datacited by 13
- 2025Predicting Cognition from fMRI:A Comparative Study of Graph, Transformer, and Kernel Models Across Task and Rest Conditionscited by 0
- 2026Explainable Deep Learning of Resting-State Functional Connectomes Reveals Network Biomarkers of Adolescent Intelligencecited by 0
- 2026Explainable Deep Learning of Resting-State Functional Connectomes Reveals Network Biomarkers of Adolescent Intelligence27 Sep 2026
- 2025Predicting Cognition from fMRI:A Comparative Study of Graph, Transformer, and Kernel Models Across Task and Rest Conditions28 Jul 2025
- 2023Brain Networks and Intelligence: A Graph Neural Network Based Approach to Resting State fMRI Data6 Nov 2023