mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

RAEGL: Risk-Aware Evidence-Gated Learning for Selective Contextual Routing under Temporal Shift

arXiv 2609.33340 ↗First posted 27 Sep 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Contextual specialization can improve forecasting accuracy, but a correction selected on one historical interval may become unreliable under temporal distribution shift. To address this issue, we propose RAEGL, a Risk-Aware Evidence-Gated Learning framework for selective contextual forecasting. RAEGL retains a validated global predictor by default and activates a contextual residual only when pre-deployment evidence supports its use. The framework separates candidate selection from gate calibration and jointly evaluates randomization significance, practically meaningful gain, and temporal stability. Experiments on real-world audits and controlled panels show how RAEGL can prevent harmful contextual deployment while making conservative opportunity costs explicit. In a reconstructed Our World in Data audit, exact fallback avoids RMSE degradations of 0.0960 and 0.0239 caused by two validation-selected corrections. In a sealed World Development Indicators evaluation, a region-based correction passes the randomization test but is withheld because its gain is only 0.000092, its country-clustered 95% confidence interval crosses zero, and only 0.02% of bootstrap replicates reach the practical threshold. In controlled panels, the stability- and support-aware extension activates in 97.2% of strong, stable-context runs while rejecting all high-drift settings. These results support RAEGL as an auditable, evidence-based mechanism for managing contextual deployment risk and as a conservative alternative to validation-driven contextual selection.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2026.

Builds on

15 of 28 references.

References · 15

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  2. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,509
  3. 2022A Time Series is Worth 64 Words: Long-term Forecasting with Transformerscited by 2,039
  4. 2017DeepAR: Probabilistic Forecasting with Autoregressive Recurrent Networkscited by 1,013
  5. 2023iTransformer: Inverted Transformers Are Effective for Time Series Forecastingcited by 931
  6. 2017Selective Classification for Deep Neural Networkscited by 852
  7. 2019Temporal Fusion Transformers for Interpretable Multi-horizon Time Series Forecastingcited by 761
  8. 2019N-BEATS: Neural basis expansion analysis for interpretable time series forecastingcited by 753
  9. 2019Conformal Prediction Under Covariate Shiftcited by 519
  10. 2024TimeMixer: Decomposable Multiscale Mixing for Time Series Forecastingcited by 346
  11. 2022Conformal Risk Controlcited by 299
  12. 2021Learn then Test: Calibrating Predictive Algorithms to Achieve Risk Controlcited by 271
3 more
  1. 2021DSelect-k: Differentiable Selection in the Mixture of Experts with Applications to Multi-Task Learningcited by 115
  2. 2023Non-Exchangeable Conformal Risk Controlcited by 29
  3. 2024Time-Series Forecasting for Out-of-Distribution Generalization Using Invariant Learningcited by 27

Built on by

Not cited yet.