Vision-Language Agents for Active Perception in Optics Laboratories
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Embodied and 3D vision-language models
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly being used in scientific workflows, but their ability as agents to directly control laboratory experiments from visual feedback remains underexplored. This capability is important because many laboratory tasks do not naturally provide dense, pre-defined numerical objectives: informative signals can be sparse, intermittent, or visually ambiguous. A more general laboratory agent should instead be able to interpret visual observations, take actions to acquire useful feedback, and adapt its behavior based on the consequences of those actions. We study whether general-purpose VLMs can perform this kind of closed-loop scientific control using experimental optics as a testbed. We evaluate agents on three experimental systems that isolate distinct capabilities: a Michelson interferometer, a two-mirror cavity, and a four-mirror optical relay. The agents observe camera images, directly issue actuator and measurement commands, and retain their interaction history without receiving an engineered scalar objective during control. Across these experiments and matched simulations, we find that, given task-specific natural-language guidance, VLMs can estimate actuator-response relationships, resolve ambiguous observations through intervention, and actively create informative visual feedback when signals are sparse. These results suggest that pretrained multimodal models can serve as important decision-making agents within the experimental loop. Our work also establishes optics as a physically grounded testbed for visual reasoning and active perception in scientific agents.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Embodied and 3D vision-language models, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 6 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2026.
Builds on
6 of 17 references.
References · 6
- 2023ChemCrow: Augmenting large-language models with chemistry toolscited by 609
- 2024Large Language Models for Human-Machine Collaborative Particle Accelerator Tuning through Natural Languagecited by 9
- 2025AI-Driven Robotics for Opticscited by 2
- 2026A Framework for Closed-Loop Robotic Assembly, Alignment and Self-Recovery of Precision Optical Systemscited by 1
- 2026CLUSTER: Derivative-free optimization of smooth functions with parameter-change costscited by 1
- 2026A Programmable Optics Cloud Laboratorycited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026OPERA: Operator-residual feedback for reliable autonomous optical experiments with language-model agents
- 2025An Anatomy of Vision-Language-Action Models: From Modules to Milestones and Challenges
- 2025PhysiAgent: An Embodied Agent Framework in Physical World
- 2025Visual Language Models as Operator Agents in the Space Domain
- 2026SCOPE: Real-Time Natural Language Camera Agent at the Edge
- 2026LabVLA: Grounding Vision-Language-Action Models in Scientific Laboratories
- 2025NEBULA: Do We Evaluate Vision-Language-Action Agents Correctly?
- 2025Vision Language Action Models in Robotic Manipulation: A Systematic Review