mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Dude, Where's My State? Execution Information Requirements for Stateful Agents

arXiv 2609.32687 ↗First posted 26 Sep 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Long-running agents must preserve information that later steps depend on. We introduce the Execution Information Requirement (EIR), a lower bound on the information that must remain accessible for correct completion under specified task and access conditions. We develop LACUNA, a framework that generates tasks with known dependencies and varies information demand, retention, and recovery separately from the difficulty of individual operations. Across four models, restoring a missing result raises accuracy on affected recall steps to 100%, compared with 0% for equal-length irrelevant information. Sufficient storage alone does not ensure success: retention policies can discard required results, errors can propagate through later computations, and agents can stop before recovery is complete. We also introduce VESTIGE, which uses agent execution traces to construct semantic graphs and measure information demand for real tasks. Across 72,562 software-agent trajectories, VESTIGE reveals a steeper distance-related decline in solution-relevant rereading for failed runs (RR 0.951 per distance doubling), while adjusted peak demand alone is not associated with failure. Together, these contributions support evaluating whether agents preserve and recover the information their tasks require.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2026.

Builds on

24 of 36 references.

References · 24

  1. 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,500
  2. 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,383
  3. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
  4. 2023MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systemscited by 1,295
  5. 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domainscited by 1,280
  6. 2024RULER: What's the Real Context Size of Your Long-Context Language Models?cited by 1,270
  7. 2016Training Deep Nets with Sublinear Memory Costcited by 825
  8. 2024LongMemEval: Benchmarking Chat Assistants on Long-Term Interactive Memorycited by 656
  9. 2026Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard, Realistic Tasks in Command Line Interfacescited by 515
  10. 2025Scaling Long-Horizon LLM Agent via Context-Foldingcited by 136
  11. 2025ACON: Optimizing Context Compression for Long-horizon LLM Agentscited by 126
  12. 2024Michelangelo: Long Context Evaluations Beyond Haystacks via Latent Structure Queriescited by 85
12 more
  1. 2016Memory-Efficient Backpropagation Through Timecited by 78
  2. 2026MemoryArena: Benchmarking Agent Memory in Interdependent Multi-Session Agentic Taskscited by 72
  3. 2025Memory as Action: Autonomous Context Curation for Long-Horizon Agentic Taskscited by 62
  4. 2026Mem2ActBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Long-Term Memory Utilization in Task-Oriented Autonomous Agentscited by 30
  5. 2026Remember When It Matters: Proactive Memory Agent for Long-Horizon Agentscited by 10
  6. 2026Your Agents Are Aging Too: Agent Lifespan Engineering for Deployed Systemscited by 7
  7. 2026Remember the Decision, Not the Description: A Rate-Distortion Framework for Agent Memorycited by 6
  8. 2026Toward a Theory of Hierarchical Memory for Language Agentscited by 5
  9. 2026What to Keep, What to Forget: A Rate--Distortion View of Memory Compaction in LLMs and Agentscited by 4
  10. 2025The Illusion of Procedural Reasoning: Measuring Long-Horizon FSM Execution in LLMscited by 3
  11. 2026Context Compaction Theorycited by 2
  12. 2026World-Model Collapse as a Phase Transitioncited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.