Refinement Symmetry in Multimodal Transformers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Attention weights depend on token counts, which change with the representation of a signal. We study refinement symmetry: splitting a representation while preserving content, position, visible context, and total mass should preserve its contribution. Building on proportional and quadrature attention, we show that split invariance forces the local mass factor to be linear for any fixed positive attention kernel, provided that factor is nondecreasing. For changed representations, a physical coupling bounds attention error by separating feature change from weight reallocation. In Qwen2.5-Omni-7B, duplicating half the visual tokens threefold changes 255 of 3,586 MVBench answers under standard attention; measure weighting preserves every answer under matched visibility. Under natural frame resampling, it reduces distributional drift. At twofold merging of a frozen video encoding, a five-seed evaluation shows an all-partition-correct accuracy gain of 1.04 percentage points over global count weighting (average group mass) and 0.93 points over standard attention. The advantage over global count also holds on WorldSense but depends on the compression budget. The result is a representation principle with a measured benefit in robustness across partitions.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2026.
Builds on
22 of 25 references.
References · 22
- 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,581
- 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,151
- 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
- 2021Mip-NeRF: A Multiscale Representation for Anti-Aliasing Neural Radiance Fieldscited by 1,957
- 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,928
- 2023MVBench: A Comprehensive Multi-modal Video Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,086
- 2022Token Merging: Your ViT But Fastercited by 995
- 2025Qwen2.5-Omni Technical Reportcited by 704
- 2024An Image is Worth 1/2 Tokens After Layer 2: Plug-and-Play Inference Acceleration for Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 629
- 2024LLaVA-PruMerge: Adaptive Token Reduction for Efficient Large Multimodal Modelscited by 394
- 2023Patch n' Pack: NaViT, a Vision Transformer for any Aspect Ratio and Resolutioncited by 226
- 2024VideoChat-Flash: Hierarchical Compression for Long-Context Video Modelingcited by 212
10 more
- 2025Audio Flamingo 3: Advancing Audio Intelligence with Fully Open Large Audio Language Modelscited by 210
- 2025WorldSense: Evaluating Real-world Omnimodal Understanding for Multimodal LLMscited by 147
- 2024Byte Latent Transformer: Patches Scale Better Than Tokenscited by 137
- 2023How Smooth Is Attention?cited by 44
- 2024Continuum Attention for Neural Operatorscited by 39
- 2024Accelerating Transformers with Spectrum-Preserving Token Mergingcited by 35
- 2025Principled Approaches for Extending Neural Architectures to Function Spaces for Operator Learningcited by 11
- 2021On the Regularity of Attentioncited by 9
- 2025Attention on the Spherecited by 9
- 2026nD-RoPE: A Generalized RoPE for n-Dimensional Position Embeddingcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.