Delayed Supervision for Test-Time Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Test-time language models adapt a compact memory while processing the input sequence. This perspective encompasses nonlinear fast-weight learning in LaCT, associative delta-rule updates in DeltaNet, and generalized delta-rule state updates in RWKV-7. Training these models to predict the next token does not explicitly require a fact to remain accessible after many subsequent memory updates. We study delayed supervision for this test-time memory: during post-training, ask a simulator-grounded question only after a long interval of unrelated events, and supervise its answer alongside ordinary next-token prediction. Questions are evaluated on disposable branches, so their answers never enter the continuing event stream. The construction distinguishes retention from revision: a retained fact must remain valid throughout the delay, whereas a revised fact must be answered with its latest value. We evaluate this approach on LaCT-760M and plain DeltaNet-1.3B using TextWorld training trajectories and shared BABILong and RULER evaluation panels, and include a separately reported RWKV-7 comparison. Relative to event-only training, delayed QA improves BABILong by 5.48 percentage points for LaCT and 1.32 points for DeltaNet, and single-needle RULER by 1.45 and 3.27 points, respectively. The RWKV-7 comparison reports gains of 4.60 and 7.00 points on its own panels. These results support delayed semantic supervision as a practical outer training objective for usable test-time memory, while leaving open how much of the benefit derives specifically from delay rather than general question-answering and answer-termination supervision.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2026.
Builds on
12 of 12 references.
References · 12
- 2020Transformers are RNNs: Fast Autoregressive Transformers with Linear Attentioncited by 2,022
- 2024RULER: What's the Real Context Size of Your Long-Context Language Models?cited by 1,346
- 2021Linear Transformers Are Secretly Fast Weight Programmerscited by 502
- 2024Parallelizing Linear Transformers with the Delta Rule over Sequence Lengthcited by 396
- 2024Learning to (Learn at Test Time): RNNs with Expressive Hidden Statescited by 355
- 2024Titans: Learning to Memorize at Test Timecited by 328
- 2015Towards AI-Complete Question Answering: A Set of Prerequisite Toy Taskscited by 314
- 2018TextWorld: A Learning Environment for Text-based Gamescited by 310
- 2024BABILong: Testing the Limits of LLMs with Long Context Reasoning-in-a-Haystackcited by 215
- 2025RWKV-7 "Goose" with Expressive Dynamic State Evolutioncited by 141
- 2025Test-Time Training Done Rightcited by 130
- 2026Reinforced Fast Weights with Next-Sequence Predictioncited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.