mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Kernel-Based Steering of CLIP with Vision-Language Model Preferences

arXiv 2609.32203 ↗First posted 26 Sep 2026cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP

Abstract (arXiv)

Large vision-language models (VLMs) can judge visual similarity, but their judgments are not directly available as compact image embeddings for efficient comparison. We study how to transfer these preferences into CLIP while retaining its image--text capabilities. We introduce ASK, a kernel-based steering method that learns from elicited pairwise judgments without accessing teacher embeddings or collecting new human similarity annotations. ASK constructs positive semidefinite target kernels within small image groups and combines visual kernel matching with an image--text distributional anchor. Low-rank adapters jointly update the visual and text encoders while regularizing predictions toward frozen CLIP. After adaptation, retrieval uses CLIP image embeddings and cosine similarity, with no VLM calls. Experiments across five image domains, four CLIP backbones, and six judges evaluate teacher agreement, retrieval, and recognition retention. For ViT-B/16, mean retrieval mAP on classes excluded from adaptation increases from 53.8 to 75.0, compared with 71.7 for DINOv2 targets with KL anchoring. Mean zero-shot accuracy with jointly adapted encoders increases from 61.8% to 62.4%, averaged over 12 benchmarks and the five adaptation domains. Prompting provides an additional capability: selecting which visual distinctions the student learns. Human-annotated evaluations across four datasets support this criterion-specific control.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 41 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2026.

Builds on

41 of 61 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Low-Rank Few-Shot Adaptation of Vision-Language Models28 May
  2. 2022Tip-Adapter: Training-free Adaption of CLIP for Few-shot Classification19 Jul
  3. 2021CLIP-Adapter: Better Vision-Language Models with Feature Adapters9 Oct
  4. 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Models2 Sep

Other references · 37

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  4. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
  5. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
  6. 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,418
  7. 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,048
  8. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,803
  9. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
  10. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
  11. 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,488
  12. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,401
25 more
  1. 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,010
  2. 2019Relational Knowledge Distillationcited by 873
  3. 2016COCO-Stuff: Thing and Stuff Classes in Contextcited by 858
  4. 2023Vision Transformers Need Registerscited by 844
  5. 2020Image Quality Assessment: Unifying Structure and Texture Similaritycited by 792
  6. 2021Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelscited by 785
  7. 2024Eyes Wide Shut? Exploring the Visual Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMscited by 719
  8. 2022MaPLe: Multi-modal Prompt Learningcited by 685
  9. 2019Similarity-Preserving Knowledge Distillationcited by 507
  10. 2023Q-Align: Teaching LMMs for Visual Scoring via Discrete Text-Defined Levelscited by 489
  11. 2018Rotation Equivariant CNNs for Digital Pathologycited by 420
  12. 2023DreamSim: Learning New Dimensions of Human Visual Similarity using Synthetic Datacited by 322
  13. 2013Challenges in Representation Learning: A report on three machine learning contestscited by 301
  14. 2023Self-regulating Prompts: Foundational Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 272
  15. 2024VLM2Vec: Training Vision-Language Models for Massive Multimodal Embedding Taskscited by 222
  16. 2026Gemma 4 Technical Reportcited by 187
  17. 2024LLaVA-Critic: Learning to Evaluate Multimodal Modelscited by 132
  18. 2021AP-10K: A Benchmark for Animal Pose Estimation in the Wildcited by 123
  19. 2024MagicLens: Self-Supervised Image Retrieval with Open-Ended Instructionscited by 119
  20. 2023GeneCIS: A Benchmark for General Conditional Image Similaritycited by 46
  21. 2025Kernel-based Unsupervised Embedding Alignment for Enhanced Visual Representation in Vision-language Modelscited by 12
  22. 2025Towards an Explainable Comparison and Alignment of Feature Embeddingscited by 9
  23. 2025FocalLens: Instruction Tuning Enables Zero-Shot Conditional Image Representationscited by 4
  24. 2025Omni-Attribute: Open-vocabulary Attribute Encoder for Visual Concept Personalizationcited by 4
  25. 2026KODA: Contrastive Representation Comparison and Alignment for Vision-Language Foundation Modelscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2022CLIP-TD: CLIP Targeted Distillation for Vision-Language Tasks
  2. 2024CLIPArTT: Adaptation of CLIP to New Domains at Test Time
  3. 2025VITRIX-CLIPIN: Enhancing Fine-Grained Visual Understanding in CLIP via Instruction Editing Data and Long Captions
  4. 2023ProbVLM: Probabilistic Adapter for Frozen Vision-Language Models
  5. 2024Fully Fine-tuned CLIP Models are Efficient Few-Shot Learners
  6. 2025HQ-CLIP: Leveraging Large Vision-Language Models to Create High-Quality Image-Text Datasets and CLIP Models
  7. 2025PairBench: Are Vision-Language Models Reliable at Comparing What They See?
  8. 2025CLIP Under the Microscope: A Fine-Grained Analysis of Multi-Object Representation