High-Probability Guarantees for SGD under β-Heavy-Tailed Gradient Noise
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Stochastic gradient descent (SGD) is widely used to train machine learning models, but subsampling the training data introduces noise into its updates. The strength and applicability of high-probability guarantees therefore depend critically on how the tails of gradient noise are modeled. Reports of heavy-tailed gradient noise in deep learning motivate relaxing the bounded-noise and sub-Gaussian assumptions commonly used in high-probability analyses of SGD. We use Young functions from Orlicz space theory to describe noise tails in a common framework. We model SGD gradient noise by adopting a Young function that preserves the finiteness of all polynomial moments while allowing tails heavier than sub-Weibull, including lognormal distributions. The resulting class is called β-heavy-tailed, with β controlling the tail heaviness. We establish concentration inequalities for β-heavy-tailed noise and combine them with a uniform bound on the difference between empirical and population gradients along the SGD trajectory to obtain high-probability bounds on optimization and population-risk stationarity for smooth nonconvex losses under trajectory assumptions. The bounds are not restricted to a particular learning-rate decay rule and make explicit the effects of noise tails and learning-rate schedules. Under the Polyak-Lojasiewicz condition, we bound the risk at the last iterate. We also analyze SGD with gradient clipping under the β-heavy-tailed noise model.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2026.
Builds on
24 of 50 references.
References · 24
- 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 5,045
- 2017Mixed Precision Trainingcited by 1,156
- 2016Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learningcited by 1,150
- 2013Stochastic First- and Zeroth-order Methods for Nonconvex Stochastic Programmingcited by 724
- 2015Train faster, generalize better: Stability of stochastic gradient descentcited by 552
- 2016Linear Convergence of Gradient and Proximal-Gradient Methods Under the Polyak-Lojasiewicz Conditioncited by 539
- 2020Loss landscapes and optimization in over-parameterized non-linear systems and neural networkscited by 233
- 2019A Tail-Index Analysis of Stochastic Gradient Noise in Deep Neural Networkscited by 214
- 2020The Heavy-Tail Phenomenon in SGDcited by 124
- 2020Fine-Grained Analysis of Stability and Generalization for Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 119
- 2017Stability and Generalization of Learning Algorithms that Converge to Global Optimacited by 100
- 2016The Landscape of Empirical Risk for Non-convex Lossescited by 86
12 more
- 2023Revisiting Gradient Clipping: Stochastic bias and tight convergence guaranteescited by 83
- 2021High-probability Bounds for Non-Convex Stochastic Optimization with Heavy Tailscited by 80
- 2019Towards Unified INT8 Training for Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 79
- 2023High-Probability Bounds for Stochastic Optimization and Variational Inequalities: the Case of Unbounded Variancecited by 61
- 2018Products of Many Large Random Matrices and Gradients in Deep Neural Networkscited by 49
- 2018Moving Beyond Sub-Gaussianity in High-Dimensional Statistics: Applications in Covariance Estimation and Linear Regressioncited by 42
- 2024Nonconvex Stochastic Optimization under Heavy-Tailed Noises: Optimal Convergence without Gradient Clippingcited by 42
- 2018Uniform Convergence of Gradients for Non-Convex Learning and Optimizationcited by 38
- 2023Revisiting the Last-Iterate Convergence of Stochastic Gradient Methodscited by 38
- 2023Revisiting the Noise Model of Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 36
- 2020High Probability Convergence Bounds for Non-convex Stochastic Gradient Descent with Sub-Weibull Noisecited by 31
- 2022On the Overlooked Structure of Stochastic Gradientscited by 13
Built on by
Not cited yet.