mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Don't Repeat Yourself: Self-Supervised Fine-Tuning for Coverage

arXiv 2609.31688 ↗First posted 16 Sep 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In verifiable domains such as math and coding, finding one correct solution among many attempts can matter more than the pass rate of each attempt. Post-training can concentrate large language model outputs around a few modes, while increasing sampling temperature has limited effectiveness. We introduce Don't Repeat Yourself Supervised Fine-Tuning (DRY-SFT), a post-training method that increases output diversity and coverage: the probability of at least one correct solution among many attempts. DRY-SFT has two stages. First, for each problem, sequentially generate K solutions, showing the model all prior attempts and asking for a different solution. Second, fine-tune on each attempt independently, removing prior attempts from the context. The process uses no reward, verifier, or correctness filter. On HumanEval+, MBPP+, and DS-1000, DRY-SFT raises pass@100 by 10.8, 12.5, and 12.4 percentage points, respectively, at a small cost to pass@1. Structural diversity, measured by abstract syntax tree edit distance among passing solutions, rises significantly on all three benchmarks. DRY-SFT also solves 244 of 600 problems that the base model did not solve in the same 200 attempts. Across nine open-weight models, lower structural diversity of the base model significantly predicts larger DRY-SFT gains, indicating that the method is especially effective on more mode-collapsed models.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2026.

Builds on

32 of 38 references.

References · 32

  1. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  2. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  3. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
  4. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
  5. 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,986
  6. 2022Competition-Level Code Generation with AlphaCodecited by 1,462
  7. 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,391
  8. 2024DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming -- The Rise of Code Intelligencecited by 1,181
  9. 2024Large Language Monkeys: Scaling Inference Compute with Repeated Samplingcited by 991
  10. 2025Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?cited by 982
  11. 2022STaR: Bootstrapping Reasoning With Reasoningcited by 940
  12. 2022DS-1000: A Natural and Reliable Benchmark for Data Science Code Generationcited by 452
20 more
  1. 2023Understanding the Effects of RLHF on LLM Generalisation and Diversitycited by 396
  2. 2023Beyond Human Data: Scaling Self-Training for Problem-Solving with Language Modelscited by 349
  3. 20242 OLMo 2 Furiouscited by 340
  4. 2025Reasoning with Exploration: An Entropy Perspectivecited by 281
  5. 2024Distilling System 2 into System 1cited by 159
  6. 2024Is Model Collapse Inevitable? Breaking the Curse of Recursion by Accumulating Real and Synthetic Datacited by 151
  7. 2022Learning by Distilling Contextcited by 138
  8. 2025Pass@k Training for Adaptively Balancing Exploration and Exploitation of Large Reasoning Modelscited by 138
  9. 2025Verbalized Sampling: How to Mitigate Mode Collapse and Unlock LLM Diversitycited by 105
  10. 2024EXAONE 3.5: Series of Large Language Models for Real-world Use Casescited by 53
  11. 2025Diverse Preference Optimizationcited by 52
  12. 2025On the Effect of Sampling Diversity in Scaling LLM Inferencecited by 18
  13. 2026SED-SFT: Selectively Encouraging Diversity in Supervised Fine-Tuningcited by 7
  14. 2025Training Large Language Models To Reason In Parallel With Global Forking Tokenscited by 6
  15. 2026Diversity in Large Language Models under Supervised Fine-Tuningcited by 4
  16. 2026Why Do Reasoning Models Lose Coverage? The Role of Data and Forks in the Roadcited by 4
  17. 2025GiFT: Gibbs Fine-Tuning for Code Generationcited by 3
  18. 2025The Road Less Traveled: Enhancing Exploration in LLMs via Sequential Samplingcited by 2
  19. 2026Sampling More, Getting Less: Calibration is the Diversity Bottleneck in LLMscited by 2
  20. 2026Where You Inject Diversity Matters: A Unified Framework for Diverse Generationcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.