mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Cross-Dataset Transfer and Unknown-Class Detection in Imbalanced SAR Ship Classification

arXiv 2609.31658 ↗First posted 15 Sep 2026cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Ship classification from Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) imagery is a critical computer vision task, yet the robustness of models under deployment shifts remains unclear. While models are often trained on one dataset and deployed on another, we lack a comprehensive understanding of their cross-dataset generalization. To address this, we evaluate six pretrained models on two SAR ship datasets in three settings: in-domain classification, cross-dataset transfer, and unknown-class detection. For unknown detection, we hold out all classes one at a time. In-domain, SARDet100K gives the best balanced accuracy on both datasets (73.4% on FUSARShip and 53.2% on OpenSARShip). In cross-dataset transfer, we observe strong failures: some models show moderate accuracy but near-chance balanced accuracy (for example, 64.5% accuracy but 33.3% balanced accuracy for OpenSARShip to FUSARShip). In unknown detection, performance depends on the held-out class and dataset, while MC-dropout variance is often close to random. These findings show that cross-dataset generalization in SAR remains limited and that task-specific uncertainty scores are often more informative than MC-dropout variance for held-out-class detection, although their relative ranking depends on the dataset and held-out class.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2026.

Builds on

20 of 36 references.

References · 20

  1. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
  2. 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,385
  3. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
  4. 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,287
  5. 2021Tokens-to-Token ViT: Training Vision Transformers from Scratch on ImageNetcited by 1,101
  6. 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 913
  7. 2018Recent Advances in Open Set Recognition: A Surveycited by 310
  8. 2022Scale-MAE: A Scale-Aware Masked Autoencoder for Multiscale Geospatial Representation Learningcited by 308
  9. 2020Being Bayesian, Even Just a Bit, Fixes Overconfidence in ReLU Networkscited by 231
  10. 2018To Trust Or Not To Trust A Classifiercited by 207
  11. 2023Foundation Models for Generalist Geospatial Artificial Intelligencecited by 149
  12. 2024Foundation Models for Remote Sensing and Earth Observation: A Surveycited by 70
8 more
  1. 2024Vision Foundation Models in Remote Sensing: A Surveycited by 54
  2. 2024SARDet-100K: Towards Open-Source Benchmark and ToolKit for Large-Scale SAR Object Detectioncited by 48
  3. 2023Predicting Gradient is Better: Exploring Self-Supervised Learning for SAR ATR with a Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecturecited by 46
  4. 2022Bayesian Learning for Neural Networks: an algorithmic surveycited by 23
  5. 2023Prototype-based Aleatoric Uncertainty Quantification for Cross-modal Retrievalcited by 23
  6. 2020Unlabelled Data Improves Bayesian Uncertainty Calibration under Covariate Shiftcited by 21
  7. 2025A Survey on SAR ship classification using Deep Learningcited by 5
  8. 2023Dual-stream contrastive predictive network with joint handcrafted feature view for SAR ship classificationcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.