mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

FIDAL: Diversity-Aware Federated Active Learning Under Real-World Distribution Shifts

arXiv 2609.31637 ↗First posted 10 Sep 2026cs.LG cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated learning enables collaborative model training across institutions without centralizing data, yet high annotation costs, domain shifts, and class imbalance remain major obstacles, especially when irrelevant out-of-distribution (OOD) samples dilute the labeled data. Existing active learning methods target uncertainty or diversity within in-distribution (ID) data and overlook unknown samples in federated clinical settings. We propose FIDAL, an open-set federated active learning framework that combines calibrated global-local evidential uncertainty, support-set diversity weighting, and adaptive OOD rejection. The rejection gate thresholds a foundation-model Gaussian-coverage signal per client and per round with Otsu's criterion, so that highly informative ID samples are queried while irrelevant outliers are excluded without any hand-tuned threshold. Evaluated on three multi-center medical imaging benchmarks (dermatology, histopathology, and mammography with organically occurring artifacts) in realistic open-set scenarios, FIDAL outperforms detector-based open-set methods by up to about 12 percentage points of balanced accuracy and is the only method on the accuracy-ID purity Pareto front of all three benchmarks. At an equal query budget it spends at least 1.3 times fewer annotations on OOD samples than every accuracy-matched baseline, saving an estimated 7-29 hours of expert reading on the mammography benchmark. By labeling only a fraction of the data pool, it matches or exceeds fully supervised performance across modalities. These results highlight the value of integrating uncertainty, diversity, and OOD rejection in open-set federated active learning for medicine.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2026.

Builds on

36 of 59 references.

References · 36

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  2. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
  3. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
  4. 2017Deep Bayesian Active Learning with Image Datacited by 819
  5. 2019Deep Batch Active Learning by Diverse, Uncertain Gradient Lower Boundscited by 610
  6. 2021Evaluating Deep Neural Networks Trained on Clinical Images in Dermatology with the Fitzpatrick 17k Datasetcited by 185
  7. 2021Disparities in Dermatology AI: Assessments Using Diverse Clinical Imagescited by 134
  8. 2022FLamby: Datasets and Benchmarks for Cross-Silo Federated Learning in Realistic Healthcare Settingscited by 125
  9. 2021SIMILAR: Submodular Information Measures Based Active Learning In Realistic Scenarioscited by 84
  10. 2017Generative Adversarial Active Learningcited by 70
  11. 2021HarmoFL: Harmonizing Local and Global Drifts in Federated Learning on Heterogeneous Medical Imagescited by 64
  12. 2024A Multimodal Vision Foundation Model for Clinical Dermatologycited by 50
24 more
  1. 2024Mammo-CLIP: A Vision Language Foundation Model to Enhance Data Efficiency and Robustness in Mammographycited by 38
  2. 2023A comprehensive survey on deep active learning in medical image analysiscited by 35
  3. 2022Active Learning for Open-set Annotationcited by 34
  4. 2023Think Twice Before Selection: Federated Evidential Active Learning for Medical Image Analysis with Domain Shiftscited by 28
  5. 2022Meta-Query-Net: Resolving Purity-Informativeness Dilemma in Open-set Active Learningcited by 25
  6. 2023Entropic Open-set Active Learningcited by 23
  7. 2022Knowledge-Aware Federated Active Learning with Non-IID Datacited by 16
  8. 2024Uncertainty Herding: One Active Learning Method for All Label Budgetscited by 15
  9. 2022Federated Active Learning (F-AL): an Efficient Annotation Strategy for Federated Learningcited by 14
  10. 2023Re-thinking Federated Active Learning based on Inter-class Diversitycited by 14
  11. 2024Robust image representations with counterfactual contrastive learningcited by 14
  12. 2022Federated Learning with Uncertainty via Distilled Predictive Distributionscited by 12
  13. 2024Equipping Computational Pathology Systems with Artifact Processing Pipelines: A Showcase for Computation and Performance Trade-offscited by 11
  14. 2024Bidirectional Uncertainty-Based Active Learning for Open Set Annotationcited by 8
  15. 2025Joint Out-of-Distribution Filtering and Data Discovery Active Learningcited by 7
  16. 2024Radio-opaque artefacts in digital mammography: automatic detection and analysis of downstream effectscited by 4
  17. 2023Deep Active Learning with Contrastive Learning Under Realistic Data Pool Assumptionscited by 3
  18. 2024Focused Active Learning for Histopathological Image Classificationcited by 3
  19. 2025FAST: Federated Active Learning with Foundation Models for Communication-efficient Sampling and Trainingcited by 3
  20. 2024Federated Active Learning Framework for Efficient Annotation Strategy in Skin-lesion Classificationcited by 2
  21. 2024Avoid Wasted Annotation Costs in Open-set Active Learning with Pre-trained Vision-Language Modelcited by 2
  22. 2025OpenPath: Open-Set Active Learning for Pathology Image Classification via Pre-trained Vision-Language Modelscited by 2
  23. 2025SAFER: A Calibrated Risk-Aware Multimodal Recommendation Model for Dynamic Treatment Regimescited by 1
  24. 2026Revisiting Unknowns: Towards Effective and Efficient Open-Set Active Learningcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.