Persistent Negatives for Adversarial Black-Box On-Policy Distillation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Black-box On-Policy Distillation (OPD) seeks to improve a student from its own generations when the teacher provides sampled responses but not token probabilities. Adversarial distillation offers one route: it learns a discriminator over prompt-matched teacher and student responses and uses its score as the policy reward. However, sampling discriminator negatives from the latest student at each step couples the learned reward to a negative distribution that changes after every policy update. We address this moving-target problem with persistent-negative adversarial distillation, a live-pool method that replaces a fraction of each discriminator batch with historical, prompt-matched teacher--student comparisons. Under matched discriminator compute, historical comparisons train the discriminator, while GRPO remains on-policy with fresh student responses. Our analysis identifies the Bayes-optimal reward as a teacher-to-negative log-density ratio and, under explicit assumptions, shows how persistent negatives anchor the discriminator and reduce reward-estimation MSE relative to fresh-negative training. Across two student families, three judges, and four judged-chat benchmarks, persistent-negative adversarial distillation consistently improves performance over current methods at matched discriminator compute. It also yields smoother fresh-policy discriminator trajectories, with fewer below-chance dips. These findings identify the discriminator's negative distribution as an important design axis in black-box on-policy distillation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2026.
Builds on
18 of 25 references.
References · 18
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
- 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,674
- 2016Generative Adversarial Imitation Learningcited by 1,576
- 2023On-Policy Distillation of Language Models: Learning from Self-Generated Mistakescited by 840
- 2016Sequence-Level Knowledge Distillationcited by 761
- 2023LMSYS-Chat-1M: A Large-Scale Real-World LLM Conversation Datasetcited by 449
- 2015Policy Distillationcited by 414
- 2016Learning from Simulated and Unsupervised Images through Adversarial Trainingcited by 287
6 more
- 2018Discriminator-Actor-Critic: Addressing Sample Inefficiency and Reward Bias in Adversarial Imitation Learningcited by 203
- 2025Black-Box On-Policy Distillation of Large Language Modelscited by 53
- 2023Lion: Adversarial Distillation of Proprietary Large Language Modelscited by 33
- 2026Rubric-based On-policy Distillationcited by 11
- 2026OVD: On-policy Verbal Distillationcited by 9
- 2025ORPO-Distill: Mixed-Policy Preference Optimization for Cross-Architecture LLM Distillationcited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Revisiting On-policy Adversarial Black-Box Distillation: Calibrating Groupwise Reward Geometry for Effective Advantage Construction
- 2026On-Policy Adversarial Flow Distillation for Autoregressive Video Generation
- 2026Dense Supervision, Sparse Updates: On the Sparsity and Geometry of On-Policy Distillation
- 2026Distill Where You Fail: Recovering Learning Signals of Negative RL-Groups from Adaptive Teacher Guidance
- 2026Adversarial Dual On-Policy Distillation from Expressive Teacher
- 2026AdvDMD: Adversarial Reward Meets DMD For High-Quality Few-Step Generation
- 2026Reward-Gated On-Policy Distillation
- 2026Revisiting On-Policy Distillation: Empirical Failure Modes and Simple Fixes