mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

NEMSim: Learning Control-Conditioned Multi-Event Physical Dynamics via Executable Event-Mechanism Priors

arXiv 2609.30718 ↗First posted 25 Sep 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

High-fidelity simulation of control-conditioned multi-event physical systems is computationally expensive, especially across broad control spaces and long trajectories. In these systems, macroscopic evolution emerges from localized discrete events whose intensities and effects depend on process controls and evolving local states, while the available system knowledge is typically expressed as event-attribute descriptions. Purely data-driven surrogates must infer these event effects from limited trajectory coverage, which can hinder generalization to unseen control regimes. Physics-guided methods instead primarily build on equation-level constraints or differentiable solvers rather than discrete event-rule priors. We therefore propose NEMSim (Neural Event-Mechanism Simulator), which compiles predefined event-attribute descriptions into an executable transition structure linking control-dependent event intensities, prior-guided mechanism attribution, and state-dependent responses. To enable evaluation of control-conditioned multi-event dynamics with explicit system knowledge, we construct a 3D KMC-based benchmark pairing high-fidelity trajectories with explicit event rules, standardized splits, and evaluation protocols. Across three settings, NEMSim reduces Avg. RMSE by 58.9%-81.3% relative to the strongest baseline in each setting. It also remains best in the data-efficiency study with training-data fractions down to 10%. Mechanism analyses further show that these gains arise from executable rule integration rather than prior access or architecture alone.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2026.

Builds on

15 of 27 references.

References · 15

  1. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 2,018
  2. 2015Convolutional LSTM Network: A Machine Learning Approach for Precipitation Nowcastingcited by 1,436
  3. 2020Learning to Simulate Complex Physics with Graph Networkscited by 880
  4. 2020Learning Mesh-Based Simulation with Graph Networkscited by 868
  5. 2015Scheduled Sampling for Sequence Prediction with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 803
  6. 2020Universal Differential Equations for Scientific Machine Learningcited by 353
  7. 2023GNOT: A General Neural Operator Transformer for Operator Learningcited by 336
  8. 2024Transolver: A Fast Transformer Solver for PDEs on General Geometriescited by 326
  9. 2022U-NO: U-shaped Neural Operatorscited by 230
  10. 2023Convolutional Neural Operators for robust and accurate learning of PDEscited by 214
  11. 2024APEBench: A Benchmark for Autoregressive Neural Emulators of PDEscited by 60
  12. 2023Eagle: Large-Scale Learning of Turbulent Fluid Dynamics with Mesh Transformerscited by 57
3 more
  1. 2023CFDBench: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Machine Learning Methods in Fluid Dynamicscited by 46
  2. 2020Autonomous Discovery of Unknown Reaction Pathways from Data by Chemical Reaction Neural Networkcited by 27
  3. 2024PAPM: A Physics-aware Proxy Model for Process Systemscited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.