Causal Retention in Interactive Agents: Interface Factorization and Selective Adaptation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Task performance need not determine which intervention mechanism an agent retains. We study causal retention: whether a frozen learned state answers a mechanism-probe map fixed independently of training, including action, context, direct target, value, and delay. For finite structural causal model classes, the optimal probe error is a Bayes decision risk. It vanishes exactly when every learning-interface fiber lies within one probe-answer fiber; any state obtained by post-processing that interface inherits the same lower bound. A posterior-coverage theorem characterizes budgeted retesting, while an exact edit decomposition shows that the shifted set is the unique support of an error-free target update. Causal Core implements these conditions through evidence-gated writing, readout filtering, temporal credit, hidden-context setup, and local diagnostic updates. Experiments cover finite causal systems, continuous simulators, an official TD-MPC2 world model, and Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct. A frozen Qwen last-layer probe reaches 0.958 balanced accuracy on source mechanisms but 0.583 on changed delays; the gated mechanism state reaches 1.000 and accepts only 0.056 of synchronized-readout candidates. In TD-MPC2, five target states per actuator recover effect-sign accuracy from 0.057 to 0.948 without degrading stable responses. Causal retention is therefore distinct from task sufficiency and source-domain decodability.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2026.
Builds on
17 of 40 references.
References · 17
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,120
- 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,854
- 2018World Modelscited by 1,513
- 2018Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representationscited by 941
- 2018DAGs with NO TEARS: Continuous Optimization for Structure Learningcited by 752
- 2015Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forestscited by 600
- 2015Causal inference using invariant prediction: identification and confidence intervalscited by 536
- 2023TD-MPC2: Scalable, Robust World Models for Continuous Controlcited by 512
- 2017Meta-learners for Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Machine Learningcited by 478
- 2017Quasi-Oracle Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effectscited by 332
- 2023A Survey on Causal Reinforcement Learningcited by 45
5 more
- 2024Score-based Causal Representation Learning: Linear and General Transformationscited by 27
- 2023Identifying Representations for Intervention Extrapolationcited by 21
- 2024Hybrid2 Neural ODE Causal Modeling and an Application to Glycemic Responsecited by 13
- 2025Sanity Checking Causal Representation Learning on a Simple Real-World Systemcited by 5
- 2026Learning Explicit Behavioral Models with Adaptive Questions and World-Model Probescited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026When Harnesses Lose the Signal: Causal Evaluation of Recovery in LLM Agents
- 2026Remember When It Matters: Proactive Memory Agent for Long-Horizon Agents
- 2026CausaLab: A Scalable Environment for Interactive Causal Discovery Toward AI Scientists
- 2026What Do Agents Learn from Trajectory-SFT: Semantics or Interfaces?
- 2025Causal Reflection with Language Models
- 2026An Introduction to Causal Reinforcement Learning
- 2024Learning by Doing: An Online Causal Reinforcement Learning Framework with Causal-Aware Policy
- 2026Grounding Before Generalizing: How AI Differs from Humans in Causal Transfer