Residual Correlation as a Diagnostic for Joint-Uncertainty Gains from GP Coregionalisation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In multi-target regression, correlated targets are often coupled through multi-output Gaussian processes with an intrinsic model of coregionalisation (GP-ICM), assuming that sharing statistical strength improves overall performance. In practice, the benefits are inconsistent. Across the settings studied, we find that the main benefit of coregionalisation is joint uncertainty quantification rather than point prediction. Raw target correlation does not predict when coupling helps; in the separable GP-ICM settings studied here, residual correlation, the cross-target dependence left unexplained by independent per-target predictors, is the strongest predictor of joint-uncertainty gains. We introduce a lightweight diagnostic, Drm logdet=-frac12logdet Rrm res, which represents the idealised joint negative log-likelihood (NLL) gain from modelling a full rather than diagonal residual covariance and is computable from independent GPs alone. Across a controlled synthetic study, 16 multi-target benchmarks, and frozen transformer and convolutional neural network representations for keypoint regression, point prediction remains largely unchanged (Delta R2≈ 0). In contrast, Drm logdet strongly predicts observed ICM NLL improvements (ρs=-0.83, p<0.001), outperforming heuristics such as the feature-to-sample ratio. We also propose Residual-ICM, which preserves independent marginal variances while adding residual-correlation structure to the joint covariance. Residual-ICM achieves the best average joint NLL among the compared methods, while the diagnostic indicates when covariance coupling is likely to be useful. The diagnostic is specific to global Gaussian residual dependence, the structure captured by separable coregionalisation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2026.
Builds on
17 of 39 references.
References · 17
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
- 2017A Survey on Multi-Task Learningcited by 840
- 2017An Overview of Multi-Task Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 803
- 2018Accurate Uncertainties for Deep Learning Using Calibrated Regressioncited by 422
- 2019Which Tasks Should Be Learned Together in Multi-task Learning?cited by 375
- 2018When Gaussian Process Meets Big Data: A Review of Scalable GPscited by 206
- 2020LEEP: A New Measure to Evaluate Transferability of Learned Representationscited by 188
- 2021LogME: Practical Assessment of Pre-trained Models for Transfer Learningcited by 172
- 2022An Information-Theoretic Approach to Transferability in Task Transfer Learningcited by 81
- 2021Frustratingly Easy Transferability Estimationcited by 45
- 2018Heterogeneous Multi-output Gaussian Process Predictioncited by 26
5 more
- 2020Generalized Multi-Output Gaussian Process Censored Regressioncited by 7
- 2020On Negative Transfer and Structure of Latent Functions in Multi-output Gaussian Processescited by 6
- 2024Fully Heteroscedastic Count Regression with Deep Double Poisson Networkscited by 3
- 2023Multi-Target Tobit Models for Completing Water Quality Datacited by 1
- 2024Non-stationary and Sparsely-correlated Multi-output Gaussian Process with Spike-and-Slab Priorcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.