mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Predicting Symptoms of Amotivation and Anhedonia among University Students with a Novel Oversampling Method

arXiv 2609.29690 ↗First posted 31 Aug 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

University students experience disproportionately high rates of common mental health conditions, such as depression, which can impair learning, social functioning, and overall well-being. Within this context, symptoms of amotivation (i.e. loss of motivational drive) and anhedonia (i.e. diminished interest or pleasure) are particularly debilitating, yet they frequently go undetected. Developing new approaches to identify students with prominent amotivation and anhedonia could enable earlier and more targeted intervention. Machine learning (ML) methods have increasingly been used to classify individuals according to symptom severity. However, these ML models often suffer from class imbalance, where the majority of cases fall in the low-symptom group and relatively few in the high-symptom group. This imbalance can reduce model accuracy and bias predictions. To address this, studies commonly employ the popular oversampling strategy SMOTE. However, SMOTE has a notable limitation: it may generate invalid values for nominal variables. In this paper, we introduce a novel and effective oversampling method that addresses this shortcoming. Our approach leverages a predictive model to generate nominal variables, rather than interpolating them. We validate our method on a large-scale GPS location dataset collected from university students and demonstrate that it is significantly better than existing oversampling approaches in predicting elevated symptoms of amotivation and anhedonia.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Aug 2026.

Builds on

11 of 46 references.

References · 11

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  2. 2019Class-Balanced Loss Based on Effective Number of Samplescited by 1,245
  3. 2019Learning Imbalanced Datasets with Label-Distribution-Aware Margin Losscited by 989
  4. 2019Modeling Tabular data using Conditional GANcited by 699
  5. 2021Tabular Data: Deep Learning is Not All You Needcited by 535
  6. 2021Deep Neural Networks and Tabular Data: A Surveycited by 491
  7. 2022Why do tree-based models still outperform deep learning on tabular data?cited by 199
  8. 2023Deep Imputation of Missing Values in Time Series Health Data: A Review with Benchmarkingcited by 30
  9. 2024Generating Realistic Tabular Data with Large Language Modelscited by 9
  10. 2025Large Language Models for Imbalanced Classification: Diversity makes the differencecited by 4
  11. 2022Machine Learning Approach for Predicting Students Academic Performance and Study Strategies based on their Motivationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.