LabFactory: Building and Evaluating Executable AI Labs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Scientific tasks specify a desired capability, but realizing it often requires building a computational system tailored to the task---acquiring data, designing representations, training models, implementing tools, and deciding how they are used at inference. We present, a framework in which an AI builder turns a scientific brief into an executable AI lab: a task-specific solver that integrates models, knowledge resources, tools, and a controller behind a fixed interface. The builder develops and packages the lab in a metered workspace; a separate host then executes the delivered artifact on held-out inputs, with reference labels kept outside the solver's input interface, and scores its outputs under the task's protocol. This makes the delivered system, rather than the builder's account of its progress, the object of evaluation. We document 10 selected constructions across six scientific task categories---from molecular and genomic prediction to medical imaging, clinical decision support, and biomedical text---whose delivered labs exceeded their configured reference values on all 12 subtests under host-side execution. Four contain predictive models fitted during construction; the others assemble executable analysis environments, knowledge resources, and tool-driven workflows around a fixed platform LLM. Together they show that an AI agent can carry a scientific brief all the way to a working lab that can still be invoked, inspected, and checked after construction ends.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2026.
Builds on
18 of 34 references.
References · 18
- 2023Capabilities of GPT-4 on Medical Challenge Problemscited by 630
- 2024MLE-bench: Evaluating Machine Learning Agents on Machine Learning Engineeringcited by 429
- 2025The AI Scientist-v2: Workshop-Level Automated Scientific Discovery via Agentic Tree Searchcited by 375
- 2023MLAgentBench: Evaluating Language Agents on Machine Learning Experimentationcited by 339
- 2023Can Generalist Foundation Models Outcompete Special-Purpose Tuning? Case Study in Medicinecited by 319
- 2025Darwin Godel Machine: Open-Ended Evolution of Self-Improving Agentscited by 294
- 2024ScienceAgentBench: Toward Rigorous Assessment of Language Agents for Data-Driven Scientific Discoverycited by 208
- 2024Benchmarking Large Language Models on Answering and Explaining Challenging Medical Questionscited by 106
- 2024MEDEC: A Benchmark for Medical Error Detection and Correction in Clinical Notescited by 77
- 2025BixBench: a Comprehensive Benchmark for LLM-based Agents in Computational Biologycited by 75
- 2024MedCalc-Bench: Evaluating Large Language Models for Medical Calculationscited by 64
- 2025MedHELM: Holistic Evaluation of Large Language Models for Medical Taskscited by 60
6 more
- 2023ECG-QA: A Comprehensive Question Answering Dataset Combined With Electrocardiogramcited by 52
- 2025MLE-STAR: Machine Learning Engineering Agent via Search and Targeted Refinementcited by 52
- 2024LabSafety Bench: Benchmarking LLMs on Safety Issues in Scientific Labscited by 24
- 2024Foundational Large Language Models for Materials Researchcited by 18
- 2025Manifold Topological Deep Learning for Biomedical Datacited by 4
- 2026MedCalc-Bench Doesn't Measure What You Think: A Benchmark Audit and the Case for Open-Book Evaluationcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.