mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Cellular-Communication-Level Interpretability for Pathology Foundation Models via Graph Distillation on Microenvironment

arXiv 2609.26073 ↗First posted 2 Aug 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Pathology foundation models (PFMs) provide strong tile-level representations but remain difficult to interpret at the cellular and microenvironmental scales that underpin clinical reasoning. We introduce Graph-Interpreter (G-Interp), a graph-distillation framework that equips a frozen PFM teacher with a cellular-communication-level "plug-in" interpreter, without modifying the teacher. For each tile, we segment cells as graph nodes and construct a microenvironment graph based on spatial adjacency. Graph neural network (GNN) students distil the PFM embedding, whilst learning attention-based message passing that yields node- and edge-level importances. We interpret these importances as cell-cell communication evidence, providing fine-grained explanations of how PFMs encode microenvironmental context. To stabilise distillation when graph abstraction is imperfect, we employ a lightweight auxiliary student to supply complementary visual cues and condition graph message passing, while keeping the primary interpretability signal graph-derived. We evaluate explanation faithfulness by mapping graph-selected evidence back to the image using instance masks and measuring teacher sensitivity under targeted vs non-target occlusions. Across multiple histopathology tasks, G-Interp produces highly scalable, microenvironment-aware explanations, while maintaining competitive predictive performance.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Aug 2026.

Builds on

13 of 30 references.

References · 13

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
  3. 2018Attention-based Deep Multiple Instance Learningcited by 1,095
  4. 2021How Attentive are Graph Attention Networks?cited by 835
  5. 2024Virchow2: Scaling Self-Supervised Mixed Magnification Models in Pathologycited by 161
  6. 2021BRACS: A Dataset for BReAst Carcinoma Subtyping in H&E Histology Imagescited by 132
  7. 2023Artificial Intelligence for Digital and Computational Pathologycited by 108
  8. 2024Phikon-v2, A large and public feature extractor for biomarker predictioncited by 74
  9. 2025A Survey on Computational Pathology Foundation Models: Datasets, Adaptation Strategies, and Evaluation Taskscited by 16
  10. 2024Rethinking Transformer for Long Contextual Histopathology Whole Slide Image Analysiscited by 12
  11. 2024Histo-Genomic Knowledge Distillation For Cancer Prognosis From Histopathology Whole Slide Imagescited by 6
  12. 2024NuLite -- Lightweight and Fast Model for Nuclei Instance Segmentation and Classificationcited by 2
1 more
  1. 2024Slide-based Graph Collaborative Training for Histopathology Whole Slide Image Analysiscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026End-to-End Cell Detection via Instance-aware Graph Modeling
  2. 2026CellPath-Bench: A Multidimensional Benchmark for Whole-Slide Cellular Representations in Pathology Foundation Models
  3. 2025IPGPhormer: Interpretable Pathology Graph-Transformer for Survival Analysis
  4. 2026See, Measure, and Reason: Learning Visually Grounded Reasoning in Pathology
  5. 2026Systematic Evaluation of Single-Cell Foundation Model Interpretability Reveals Attention Captures Co-Expression Rather Than Unique Regulatory Signal
  6. 2026MAD: Microenvironment-Aware Distillation -- A Pretraining Strategy for Virtual Spatial Omics from Microscopy
  7. 2026Spatial Message Passing in Language Space for Pathology Image Interpretation
  8. 2025DiffEx: Explaining a Classifier with Diffusion Models to Identify Microscopic Cellular Variations