ChainUQ: Reasoning Consistency-Aware Uncertainty Quantification for Large Language Models
On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking
Abstract (arXiv)
While large language models (LLMs) exhibit impressive reasoning capabilities, response-level confidence may remain unreliable when intermediate claims conflict with the final conclusion. Therefore, effective uncertainty quantification (UQ) is required to capture logical inconsistencies within the reasoning chain, not just the correctness of the final output. Current approaches have two major limitations: (1) their reliance on token-level probabilities fails to capture reasoning consistency, and (2) they lack mechanisms to dynamically calibrate confidence using the structural logic of the generated chain. To advance existing research, we introduce ChainUQ, a reasoning consistency-aware uncertainty quantification framework for LLMs. ChainUQ consists of two key technical components: an alignment-aware lightweight UQ module that estimates a raw intrinsic model confidence score from frozen features aligned to the final conclusion, and a reasoning consistency-aware calibrator that refines this score using reasoning-chain consistency evidence. Evaluations across diverse in-distribution and out-of-distribution benchmarks show that ChainUQ consistently improves response-level uncertainty estimation, achieving an average 3.1% relative gain in AUROC and up to 45.0% relative reduction in ECE, and can be directly transferred to new settings without additional fine-tuning.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 19 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Aug 2026.
Builds on
19 of 23 references.
References · 19
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
- 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,754
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
- 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,998
- 2020Constructing A Multi-hop QA Dataset for Comprehensive Evaluation of Reasoning Stepscited by 1,282
- 2023FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generationcited by 1,282
- 2021Did Aristotle Use a Laptop? A Question Answering Benchmark with Implicit Reasoning Strategiescited by 743
- 2023The Internal State of an LLM Knows When It's Lyingcited by 659
- 2015Towards AI-Complete Question Answering: A Set of Prerequisite Toy Taskscited by 314
- 2024Semantic Entropy Probes: Robust and Cheap Hallucination Detection in LLMscited by 259
7 more
- 2024Fact-Checking the Output of Large Language Models via Token-Level Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 162
- 2024Lookback Lens: Detecting and Mitigating Contextual Hallucinations in Large Language Models Using Only Attention Mapscited by 142
- 2024Can Large Language Models Faithfully Express Their Intrinsic Uncertainty in Words?cited by 87
- 2021SpartQA: : A Textual Question Answering Benchmark for Spatial Reasoningcited by 77
- 2022StepGame: A New Benchmark for Robust Multi-Hop Spatial Reasoning in Textscited by 68
- 2020IIRC: A Dataset of Incomplete Information Reading Comprehension Questionscited by 53
- 2025A Head to Predict and a Head to Question: Pre-trained Uncertainty Quantification Heads for Hallucination Detection in LLM Outputscited by 21
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025CoT-UQ: Improving Response-wise Uncertainty Quantification in LLMs with Chain-of-Thought
- 2025Uncertainty Quantification and Confidence Calibration in Large Language Models: A Survey
- 2026Embedding Perturbation may Better Reflect Intermediate-Step Uncertainty in LLM Reasoning
- 2026Semantic Calibration Prevails Where Token Confidence Fails: Benchmarking Long-Form Scientific QA
- 2026Probability is Not Enough: Exploring and Counting Divergent Tokens for Reasoning Uncertainty Quantification in LLMs
- 2026Complementing Self-Consistency with Cross-Model Disagreement for Uncertainty Quantification
- 2025Revisiting Uncertainty Estimation and Calibration of Large Language Models
- 2026The Origins of Stochasticity: Comprehensive Investigations on Uncertainty Quantification for Large Language Models