LLM-Driven Training-free Location-Attribute Synergic Fusion: A Closed-Loop Paradigm for Dual-source Encrypted POIs and LULC Mapping
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Dual-source encrypted points of interest (DSEP), POIs from two encrypted coordinate systems, suffer from intertwined location and attribute uncertainties, including nonlinear systematic misalignment and naming inconsistency, hindering land-use/land-cover (LULC) mapping. To the best of our knowledge, this paper is the first to propose an LLM-driven, training-free location-attribute synergic closed-loop optimization paradigm for DSEP fusion. The paradigm jointly refines location transformation and attribute correspondences through iterative feedback. Attribute-synergic location fusion uses an LLM-driven attribute matching method to establish DSEP correspondences, reducing matching complexity from O(N^2) to O(N), and refines transformation coefficients using an improved particle swarm optimization algorithm within ISODATA-clustered local subregions. Location-synergic attribute fusion then reassesses attribute confidence from updated geometric residuals through an LLM-fuzzy method. The refined correspondences feed back into location optimization, forming a bidirectional closed loop. Sample purification and adaptive radius contraction enable convergence in essentially two iterations. We further propose a training-free LULC mapping method that inherits land-use classes from encrypted maps through location fusion, producing vector-raster integrated LULC maps. A reference-free POI fusion evaluation method is applied across 31 provincial capitals and municipalities in mainland China. Experiments show that our method achieves an average DSEP location fusion residual of 4.58 m and attribute fusion accuracy of 95.12%, improving upon the open-source baseline and state-of-the-art method by 1.77 m and 14.87%, respectively. Overall, the method provides a training-free solution for DSEP fusion and enables georeferencing of encrypted vector data to WGS-84 without field-surveyed ground control points.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Sep 2026.
Builds on
5 of 35 references.
References · 5
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2025Vision Mamba in Remote Sensing: A Comprehensive Survey of Techniques, Applications and Outlookcited by 6
- 2025Bridging Semantics and Geometry: A Decoupled LVLM-SAM Framework for Reasoning Segmentation in Optical Remote Sensingcited by 6
- 2024Self-consistent Deep Geometric Learning for Heterogeneous Multi-source Spatial Point Data Predictioncited by 3
- 2023Conflating point of interest (POI) data: A systematic review of matching methodscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.