mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Linguistic Features for Interpretable Textual Entailment

arXiv 2609.24932 ↗First posted 21 Sep 2026cs.CL cs.SCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite the success of neural models in natural language processing, their black-box nature limits interpretability and conceals the linguistic phenomena underlying their predictions. We present SLITE, an explainable hybrid model for Recognizing Textual Entailment that integrates two complementary layers of semantic analysis: a structural-relational layer, based on semantic compatibility and incompatibility between compositional entities, and a distributional-informational layer, based on structured patterns of information change between embedding-based representations of the premise and the hypothesis. We propose 17 features that combine entity-level semantic relations, polarity-sensitive lexical matching, and alignment measures over semantic sub-representations of the similarity matrix, including measures based on entropy and transfer entropy. A logistic regression trained on these features achieves an accuracy of 83% on three-class SICK and 96% on SICK-CE, outperforming IsoLex by 4 percentage points and falling within 2 percentage points of RoBERTa with a fraction of its computational complexity. Ablation studies and SHAP analysis confirm that structural-relational features are the primary drivers of classification, while distributional-informational features provide essential complementary contributions, particularly for detecting neutrality and contradiction. Our results demonstrate that further exploration of hybrid approaches is a viable and scientifically productive alternative to massive neural architectures, and we hope they will strengthen the dialogue between linguistic theory and computational modeling of inference

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Sep 2026.

Builds on

21 of 45 references.

References · 21

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  3. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  4. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
  5. 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,837
  6. 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,718
  7. 2016ConceptNet 5.5: An Open Multilingual Graph of General Knowledgecited by 1,065
  8. 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 864
  9. 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 831
  10. 2019Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language Understandingcited by 798
  11. 2018Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Datacited by 656
  12. 2020A Survey on the Explainability of Supervised Machine Learningcited by 225
9 more
  1. 2016A Decomposable Attention Model for Natural Language Inferencecited by 214
  2. 2015Reasoning about Entailment with Neural Attentioncited by 68
  3. 2019MonaLog: a Lightweight System for Natural Language Inference Based on Monotonicitycited by 20
  4. 2017LangPro: Natural Language Theorem Provercited by 15
  5. 2023Discriminative Feature Attributions: Bridging Post Hoc Explainability and Inherent Interpretabilitycited by 10
  6. 2023SensePOLAR: Word sense aware interpretability for pre-trained contextual word embeddingscited by 9
  7. 2018Acquisition of Phrase Correspondences using Natural Deduction Proofscited by 8
  8. 2020XTE: Explainable Text Entailmentcited by 3
  9. 2017Textual Entailment with Structured Attentions and Compositioncited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.