mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ChemCLIR-Bench: Benchmarking Cross-Lingual Information Retrieval in Multilingual Chemical Patents

arXiv 2609.23231 ↗First posted 19 Sep 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Cross-lingual information retrieval (CLIR) is increasingly important in multi-national industries, where critical technical evidence may exist in a different language than the query. However, existing benchmarks do not adequately capture domain-specific cross-lingual retrieval or the retrieval-depth and recoverability failures that aggregate recall hides. In this work, we benchmark CLIR in the chemical domain, with a focus on patent data. We construct a multilingual dataset from Google Patents and the European Patent Office (EPO) data, spanning five languages (covering major Eastern and Western languages) and reflecting the diversity and complexity of real-world industrial documentation. Using this dataset, we systematically evaluate eight state-of-the-art embedding models for cross-lingual retrieval. Our results show a substantial performance gap between monolingual and cross-lingual settings: for the best-performing model, Recall@10 drops from 0.72 to 0.53 in cross-lingual setting. Retrieval depth also degrades significantly, with relevant documents ranked lower across languages in cross-lingual scenarios. Furthermore, some multilingual embedding models that perform strongly in monolingual settings exhibit sharp declines when queries and documents are in different languages, providing practical insights for model selection in cross-lingual use cases. These findings highlight critical limitations of current approaches and emphasize the need for more robust cross-lingual retrieval methods in domain-specific settings. Our benchmark provides actionable insights for model selection and establishes a controlled diagnostic evaluation framework for CLIR over industrial technical text. Data and code are publicly available at https://github.com/MohammadKhodadad/Multi-Lingual-QAC.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Sep 2026.

Builds on

19 of 36 references.

References · 19

  1. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
  2. 2023FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generationcited by 1,282
  3. 2019Passage Re-ranking with BERTcited by 645
  4. 2018Massively Multilingual Sentence Embeddings for Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Transfer and Beyondcited by 434
  5. 2020Pretrained Transformers for Text Ranking: BERT and Beyondcited by 267
  6. 2020Self-Alignment Pretraining for Biomedical Entity Representationscited by 237
  7. 2018Towards a Better Metric for Evaluating Question Generation Systemscited by 52
  8. 2021Guiding the Growth: Difficulty-Controllable Question Generation through Step-by-Step Rewritingcited by 30
  9. 2022Varifocal Question Generation for Fact-checkingcited by 27
  10. 2024QGEval: Benchmarking Multi-dimensional Evaluation for Question Generationcited by 17
  11. 2025Overview of the TREC 2024 NeuCLIR Trackcited by 13
  12. 2024ChemTEB: Chemical Text Embedding Benchmark, an Overview of Embedding Models Performance & Efficiency on a Specific Domaincited by 12
7 more
  1. 2024Efficient Terminology Integration for LLM-based Translation in Specialized Domainscited by 7
  2. 2025Linguistic Nepotism: Trading-off Quality for Language Preference in Multilingual RAGcited by 7
  3. 2025Bridging Language Gaps: Advances in Cross-Lingual Information Retrieval with Multilingual LLMscited by 6
  4. 2025The Cross-Lingual Cost: Retrieval Biases in RAG over Arabic-English Corporacited by 5
  5. 2025ChEmbed: Enhancing Chemical Literature Search Through Domain-Specific Text Embeddingscited by 5
  6. 2025CLIRudit: Cross-Lingual Information Retrieval of Scientific Documentscited by 2
  7. 2025What Drives Cross-lingual Ranking? Retrieval Approaches with Multilingual Language Modelscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.