Bridging Language Gaps: Advances in Cross-Lingual Information Retrieval with Multilingual LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Cross-lingual information retrieval (CLIR) addresses the challenge of retrieving relevant documents written in languages different from that of the original query. Research in this area has typically framed the task as monolingual retrieval augmented by translation, treating retrieval methods and cross-lingual capabilities in isolation. Both monolingual and cross-lingual retrieval usually follow a pipeline of query expansion, ranking, re-ranking and, increasingly, question answering. Recent advances, however, have shifted from translation-based methods toward embedding-based approaches and leverage multilingual large language models (LLMs), for which aligning representations across languages remains a central challenge. The emergence of cross-lingual embeddings and multilingual LLMs has introduced a new paradigm, offering improved retrieval performance and enabling answer generation. This survey provides a comprehensive overview of developments from early translation-based methods to state-of-the-art embedding-driven and generative techniques. It presents a structured account of core CLIR components, evaluation practices, and available resources. Persistent challenges such as data imbalance and linguistic variation are identified, while promising directions are suggested for advancing equitable and effective cross-lingual information retrieval. By situating CLIR within the broader landscape of information retrieval and multilingual language processing, this work not only reviews current capabilities but also outlines future directions for building retrieval systems that are robust, inclusive, and adaptable.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2025.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 4.
6 papers.
- 2026Beyond Monolingual Deep Research: Evaluating Agents and Retrievers with Cross-Lingual BrowseComp-Pluscited by 2
- 2025What Drives Cross-lingual Ranking? Retrieval Approaches with Multilingual Language Modelscited by 1
- 2026Ebisu: Benchmarking Large Language Models in Japanese Financecited by 1
- 2025Languages are Modalities: Cross-Lingual Alignment via Encoder Injectioncited by 0
- 2026Natural Language Code Retrieval for 1C:Enterprise: An Open Benchmark and Efficient Bi-Encodercited by 0
- 2026ChemCLIR-Bench: Benchmarking Cross-Lingual Information Retrieval in Multilingual Chemical Patentscited by 0
- 2026ChemCLIR-Bench: Benchmarking Cross-Lingual Information Retrieval in Multilingual Chemical Patents19 Sep 2026
- 2026Natural Language Code Retrieval for 1C:Enterprise: An Open Benchmark and Efficient Bi-Encoder20 Aug 2026
- 2026Beyond Monolingual Deep Research: Evaluating Agents and Retrievers with Cross-Lingual BrowseComp-Plus13 Jun 2026
- 2026Ebisu: Benchmarking Large Language Models in Japanese Finance1 Feb 2026
- 2025What Drives Cross-lingual Ranking? Retrieval Approaches with Multilingual Language Models24 Nov 2025
- 2025Languages are Modalities: Cross-Lingual Alignment via Encoder Injection31 Oct 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2021Leveraging Advantages of Interactive and Non-Interactive Models for Vector-Based Cross-Lingual Information Retrieval
- 2026MIMO: Multilingual Information Retrieval via Monolingual Objectives
- 2025The Cross-Lingual Cost: Retrieval Biases in RAG over Arabic-English Corpora
- 2024Translate-Distill: Learning Cross-Language Dense Retrieval by Translation and Distillation
- 2021Learning Cross-Lingual IR from an English Retriever
- 2024Transforming LLMs into Cross-modal and Cross-lingual Retrieval Systems
- 2026Query Translation vs. Cross-Lingual Embeddings for Sinhala-Tamil E-Government Information Retrieval ↗
- 2023Soft Prompt Decoding for Multilingual Dense Retrieval