mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

LPINNs: First-Layer Gated Localization for Physics-Informed Neural Networks

arXiv 2609.22984 ↗First posted 19 Sep 2026cs.LG cs.CE cs.NEcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) use one shared representation over the computational domain, which can become difficult to optimize on long domains and for high-order operators. We study a minimal alternative: multiply the first hidden activation of an otherwise unchanged dense PINN by input-dependent localization functions, giving first-layer units receptive fields without partitioning the domain or adding interface losses. We screen 13 families of localization functions, in up to three parameterizations each, on a nonlinear harmonic oscillator (HO), a heat equation on a long spatial interval, and a manufactured four-dimensional (4D) fourth-order problem, with ten paired seeds throughout. Three configurations give large reductions in solution error at matched budgets: (i) Fixed Gaussian localization functions on the 2π HO domain cut mean solution RMSE from 4.8369×10-1 to 8.83×10-3 at 3k epochs. (ii) The inverse-quadratic family with learnable centers and widths cuts it from 2.896×10-1 to 3.06×10-2 on the 8π heat domain at 10k epochs. (iii) Fixed bump localization functions cut it from 1.75947×101 to 2.260×10-1 on the 4π 4D domain at 10k epochs. Every paired seed improves in these three comparisons. The screen also shows that the mechanism is not a free win: on HO only 2 of 13 families beat the baseline, and 10 of the remaining 11 are 9 to 23 times worse; on 4D four families are non-finite and five are more than three orders of magnitude worse than the baseline. The inverse-quadratic family is the only one that beats the baseline on all three equations. Overall, these results show that first-layer localization can provide measurable improvements to baseline PINNs on long-domain and high-order problems.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Sep 2026.

Builds on

9 of 19 references.

References · 9

  1. 2020Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation Functionscited by 2,238
  2. 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,341
  3. 2021Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networkscited by 643
  4. 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 634
  5. 2017Solving high-dimensional partial differential equations using deep learningcited by 556
  6. 2020On the eigenvector bias of Fourier feature networks: From regression to solving multi-scale PDEs with physics-informed neural networkscited by 284
  7. 2020hp-VPINNs: Variational Physics-Informed Neural Networks With Domain Decompositioncited by 236
  8. 2021Finite Basis Physics-Informed Neural Networks (FBPINNs): a scalable domain decomposition approach for solving differential equationscited by 145
  9. 2020Local Extreme Learning Machines and Domain Decomposition for Solving Linear and Nonlinear Partial Differential Equationscited by 81

Built on by

Not cited yet.