FRAMES: Failure Recovery And Monitoring of Embodied Skills for Humanoid Loco-Manipulation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language model (LLM) planners can decompose natural-language instructions and select reusable robot skills, but choosing the correct skill does not guarantee successful physical execution. This gap is especially important in humanoid loco-manipulation, where errors during approach, grasping, transport, or placement can invalidate the remainder of a long-horizon plan. We present FRAMES, a failure-aware supervisory framework for the Unitree G1 humanoid that operates above the CEER whole-body controller. A Planner Agent selects subtasks through parameterized mid-level skills, while a vision-language-model-based Monitor Agent evaluates each skill using temporal multi-view observations and structured robot and contact evidence. Detected failures stop the active skill and provide grounded feedback to a Recovery Agent. The framework further includes a Memory Module for reusing prior skill experience, and geometric grounding via depth and segmentation. We independently evaluate the monitoring module of the framework in MuJoCo using 100 trials comprising 50 failed and 50 successful executions across five tasks. The monitor detects 48 of 50 failures, correctly accepts 46 of 50 successful executions, and achieves 94.0% overall accuracy. These results provide initial evidence for the monitoring component, while end-to-end evaluation of the complete recovery loop remains ongoing.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Sep 2026.
Builds on
13 of 13 references.
References · 13
- 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,348
- 2022Inner Monologue: Embodied Reasoning through Planning with Language Modelscited by 1,081
- 2025SAM 3: Segment Anything with Conceptscited by 906
- 2023REFLECT: Summarizing Robot Experiences for Failure Explanation and Correctioncited by 175
- 2024AHA: A Vision-Language-Model for Detecting and Reasoning Over Failures in Robotic Manipulationcited by 125
- 2024Code-as-Monitor: Constraint-aware Visual Programming for Reactive and Proactive Robotic Failure Detectioncited by 63
- 2023DoReMi: Grounding Language Model by Detecting and Recovering from Plan-Execution Misalignmentcited by 61
- 2024RACER: Rich Language-Guided Failure Recovery Policies for Imitation Learningcited by 49
- 2024Closed-Loop Open-Vocabulary Mobile Manipulation with GPT-4Vcited by 40
- 2022CAPE: Corrective Actions from Precondition Errors using Large Language Modelscited by 30
- 2026CEER: Compliant End-Effector and Root Control as a Unified Interface for Hierarchical Humanoid Loco-Manipulationcited by 3
- 2026Cybo-Waiter: A Physical Agentic Framework for Humanoid Whole-Body Locomotion-Manipulationcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.