mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SCoP: Structured Constraint Parsing for Evidence-Space Control in Temporal Knowledge Graph Question Answering

arXiv 2609.22213 ↗First posted 2 Sep 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Temporal Knowledge Graph Question Answering (TKGQA) requires answer inference from evidence that is both structurally valid and temporally admissible. Existing methods often leave anchor-event binding, temporal admissibility, and ordinal selection implicit in model reasoning, task-specific training, or similarity-driven retrieval, allowing locally relevant but invalid facts to enter the answer context. We formulate complex TKGQA as evidence-space control and propose SCoP (Structured Constraint Parsing), a constraint-centric framework that externalizes temporal decisions before answer inference. Instead of treating retrieved facts as admissible evidence by default, SCoP separates answer-seeking event patterns from temporal anchor events, conservatively grounds them to canonical TKG entities and relations, and translates temporal intent into executable constraints with optional ranking requirements. These constraints operate over normalized point and interval ranges, enabling deterministic filtering of structurally compatible candidates and producing a compact evidence space for generation. Experiments on MultiTQ and TimelineCronQ-R assess SCoP across timestamped point-fact and interval-oriented settings with richer temporal relations and ordering dependencies. Without task-specific parameter updates, SCoP achieves 0.825 Hits@1 on MultiTQ and 0.761 Hits@1 on TimelineCronQ-R, with gains on constraint-intensive question types. These results support explicit evidence-space control over unconstrained retrieval or implicit temporal reasoning.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Sep 2026.

Builds on

10 of 29 references.

References · 10

  1. 2017Billion-scale similarity search with GPUscited by 2,477
  2. 2025Search-R1: Training LLMs to Reason and Leverage Search Engines with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,371
  3. 2022Interleaving Retrieval with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Knowledge-Intensive Multi-Step Questionscited by 911
  4. 2022Precise Zero-Shot Dense Retrieval without Relevance Labelscited by 508
  5. 2017Know-Evolve: Deep Temporal Reasoning for Dynamic Knowledge Graphscited by 149
  6. 2018Learning Sequence Encoders for Temporal Knowledge Graph Completioncited by 145
  7. 2021Question Answering Over Temporal Knowledge Graphscited by 99
  8. 2021Complex Temporal Question Answering on Knowledge Graphscited by 69
  9. 2019TEQUILA: Temporal Question Answering over Knowledge Basescited by 47
  10. 2023Temporal Knowledge Question Answering via Abstract Reasoning Inductioncited by 23

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Two-stage Generative Question Answering on Temporal Knowledge Graph Using Large Language Models
  2. 2025RTQA : Recursive Thinking for Complex Temporal Knowledge Graph Question Answering with Large Language Models
  3. 2026Temporal-Aware Heterogeneous Graph Reasoning with Multi-View Fusion for Temporal Question Answering
  4. 2025Plan of Knowledge: Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models for Temporal Knowledge Graph Question Answering
  5. 2026Let the Agent Search: Autonomous Exploration Beats Rigid Workflows in Temporal Question Answering
  6. 2024MRAG: A Modular Retrieval Framework for Time-Sensitive Question Answering
  7. 2026Foresight-over-Graph: Reasoning Beyond Local Horizons for Knowledge Base Question Answering
  8. 2024Self-Improvement Programming for Temporal Knowledge Graph Question Answering