Correcting Learning-based Perception for Safety
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Learning-enabled perception is important in many autonomous systems. Unlike traditional sensors, the boundary where ML perception does or does not work is poorly characterized. Incorrect perception can lead to unsafe or overtly conservative downstream control actions. In this paper, we propose a two-step strategy for correcting ML-based state estimation. First, an offline computation is used to characterize the uncertainties resulting from the ML module's state estimation, using preimages of perception contracts. Second, at runtime, a risk heuristic is used to choose particular states from the uncertain estimates to drive the control decisions. We perform extensive simulation-based evaluation of this runtime perception correction strategy on different vision-based adaptive cruise controllers (ACC modules), in different weather conditions, and road scenarios. Out of 45 ACC scenarios where the original perception-based control system using Yolo and LaneNet led to safety violations, in 73% of the scenarios, our runtime perception correction preserved safety; our method wouldn't be able to recover 27% of the scenarios where the construction of the preimages of perception contracts is not fully conformant. Further, our runtime perception correction strategy is not overly conservative---on the average only a 2.8% increase in completion time is experienced in the corrected scenarios, with mild interventions.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Aug 2026.
Builds on
24 of 35 references.
References · 24
- 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,449
- 2015Weight Uncertainty in Neural Networkscited by 554
- 2019Control Barrier Functions: Theory and Applicationscited by 372
- 2021A System for General In-Hand Object Re-Orientationcited by 165
- 2015Bayesian Convolutional Neural Networks with Bernoulli Approximate Variational Inferencecited by 159
- 2022Safe Control with Learned Certificates: A Survey of Neural Lyapunov, Barrier, and Contraction methodscited by 151
- 2018Towards End-to-End Lane Detection: an Instance Segmentation Approachcited by 129
- 2023Real-Time Flying Object Detection with YOLOv8cited by 94
- 2019Adversarial Examples in Modern Machine Learning: A Reviewcited by 36
- 2020Guaranteeing Safety of Learned Perception Modules via Measurement-Robust Control Barrier Functionscited by 33
- 2021Pylot: A Modular Platform for Exploring Latency-Accuracy Tradeoffs in Autonomous Vehiclescited by 33
- 2022Learning Safe, Generalizable Perception-based Hybrid Control with Certificatescited by 24
12 more
- 2021iCurb: Imitation Learning-based Detection of Road Curbs using Aerial Images for Autonomous Drivingcited by 21
- 2019Robust Guarantees for Perception-Based Controlcited by 20
- 2021Verifying Controllers with Convolutional Neural Network-based Perception: A Case for Intelligible, Safe, and Precise Abstractionscited by 19
- 2022Safe Output Feedback Motion Planning from Images via Learned Perception Modules and Contraction Theorycited by 19
- 2023Closed-loop Analysis of Vision-based Autonomous Systems: A Case Studycited by 18
- 2017DRYVR:Data-driven verification and compositional reasoning for automotive systemscited by 14
- 2022Probabilities Are Not Enough: Formal Controller Synthesis for Stochastic Dynamical Models with Epistemic Uncertaintycited by 11
- 2021Adaptive Lookahead Pure-Pursuit for Autonomous Racingcited by 4
- 2018Autonomous Driving in Reality with Reinforcement Learning and Image Translationcited by 3
- 2021Monotonic Safety for Scalable and Data-Efficient Probabilistic Safety Analysiscited by 3
- 2022Assuring Safety of Vision-Based Swarm Formation Controlcited by 3
- 2017Verifying safety of an autonomous spacecraft rendezvous missioncited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.