mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AI-GRACE: A Use-Case Operationalization Framework for Agentic AI: From Organizational Objectives and Obligations to Deployment Capabilities and Architecture

arXiv 2609.21192 ↗First posted 18 Sep 2026cs.AI cs.CY cs.MAcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance also fits: Financial trading and forecasting agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Organizations deploying agentic artificial intelligence must determine more than whether a model is trustworthy; they must establish what to validate, control, and observe for a use case to deliver its intended outcome while meeting applicable obligations. This paper proposes AI-GRACE (Agentic Intelligence-Governance, Risk, Assurance, Controls, and Evidence) as a use-case operationalization framework connecting organizational governance with technical implementation. The proposal draws on professional observations and a purposive synthesis of standards and literature, using design science to frame the method contribution and situational method engineering to guide contextual tailoring and reuse. The framework establishes objectives and obligations and then assesses risks in seven proposed domains, including mission and value realization. It derives requirements for assurance before deployment, runtime controls, and evidence, which guide capability qualification, gap assessment, and a logical architecture. An Agent Operating Envelope specifies permitted actions and escalation conditions, while Risk-Aligned Independence Levels (RAIL) summarize the authorized independence. A fictional retail banking application illustrates the method. The contribution is a traceable basis for deciding what an organization must implement, what it already supports, and what remains unresolved. Empirical evaluation must establish whether it improves deployment decisions, efficiency, and reuse.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 1 of its 7 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Sep 2026.

Builds on

1 of 7 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025AAGATE: A NIST AI RMF-Aligned Governance Platform for Agentic AI29 Oct

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025With Great Capabilities Come Great Responsibilities: Introducing the Agentic Risk & Capability Framework for Governing Agentic AI Systems
  2. 2026Governing the Agentic Enterprise: A Governance Maturity Model for Managing AI Agent Sprawl in Business Operations
  3. 2026Beyond Task Success: An Evidence-Synthesis Framework for Evaluating, Governing, and Orchestrating Agentic AI
  4. 2025Perceptions of Agentic AI in Organizations: Implications for Responsible AI and ROI
  5. 2026A Practical Guide to Agentic AI Transition in Organizations
  6. 2025AGENTSAFE: A Unified Framework for Ethical Assurance and Governance in Agentic AI
  7. 2026Mind The Gap: How The Technical Mechanism Of Agentic AI Outpace Global Legal Frameworks
  8. 2026The CASE Framework: A Multi-Disciplinary Control Architecture for Governing Enterprise Agentic AI