Beyond PINNs: A Unified Gauss--Newton and Petrov--Galerkin Framework for Neural and Hybrid PDE Solvers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Physics-informed neural networks and finite element methods provide two different paradigms for the numerical approximation of partial differential equations: the former are commonly trained by minimizing pointwise strong residuals, whereas the latter are naturally built from weak variational formulations and the finite-dimensional systems obtained after discretization. In this work, we introduce a common framework based on the discretization of functional Gauss--Newton problems by finite families of linear measurements. We show that, through an appropriate duality pairing, the linear measurements can be represented by test functions. The resulting Gauss--Newton system is then precisely a Petrov--Galerkin discretization of the linearized functional problem. This perspective recovers pointwise collocation and natural-gradient constructions as particular cases, while making the choice of test functions an explicit algorithmic design choice. We specialize this framework to elliptic problems, where it naturally leads to weak residual formulations and to a hybrid finite element--neural construction acting on complementary approximation spaces. Numerical experiments support the proposed framework and demonstrate the effectiveness of weak Gauss--Newton formulations and hybrid finite element--neural approximations.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Sep 2026.
Builds on
20 of 46 references.
References · 20
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2014On the Properties of Neural Machine Translation: Encoder-Decoder Approachescited by 1,304
- 2015Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a surveycited by 855
- 2020hp-VPINNs: Variational Physics-Informed Neural Networks With Domain Decompositioncited by 236
- 2022A comprehensive study of non-adaptive and residual-based adaptive sampling for physics-informed neural networkscited by 236
- 2019Variational Physics-Informed Neural Networks For Solving Partial Differential Equationscited by 148
- 2021Efficient training of physics-informed neural networks via importance samplingcited by 110
- 2022Mitigating Propagation Failures in Physics-informed Neural Networks using Retain-Resample-Release (R3) Samplingcited by 73
- 2023Can Physics-Informed Neural Networks beat the Finite Element Method?cited by 68
- 2024PINNACLE: PINN Adaptive ColLocation and Experimental points selectioncited by 32
- 2024Gauss-Newton Natural Gradient Descent for Physics-Informed Computational Fluid Dynamicscited by 28
- 2026Curvature-Aware Optimization for High-Accuracy Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 11
8 more
- 2024ANaGRAM: A Natural Gradient Relative to Adapted Model for efficient PINNs learningcited by 7
- 2025Dual Natural Gradient Descent for Scalable Training of Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 6
- 2022Fixed-budget online adaptive learning for physics-informed neural networks. Towards parameterized problem inferencecited by 3
- 2026Natural gradient descent with momentumcited by 2
- 2025AMStraMGRAM: Adaptive Multi-cutoff Strategy Modification for ANaGRAMcited by 1
- 2025A new initialisation to Control Gradients in Sinusoidal Neural networkcited by 1
- 2026Error whitening: Why Gauss-Newton outperforms Newtoncited by 1
- 2026An Optimisation Framework for the Well-Conditioned Training of Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.