To Copy or Not to Copy: Controlling Speculative Decoding via Intrinsic Model Signals
On the map: Efficient LLM inference and serving → Speculative decoding
Abstract (arXiv)
Speculative Decoding (SD) has significantly accelerated Large Language Model (LLM) inference, yet existing approaches face a fundamental tradeoff between two drafting strategies: neural drafting and context-based copying. Neural drafts (e.g., EAGLE3) provide robust performance across diverse text settings, while copy-based methods achieve higher speedups in copy-intensive regimes by generating candidates faster and exploiting long repetition spans for near-perfect speculation. We analyze existing copy-based methods and find that they are prone to accidental repetitions where surface-level n-gram overlap does not reflect a structural intent to copy, leading to false-positive triggers that ultimately degrade throughput. We introduce SwitchSD, an adaptive framework that treats copying as a latent control signal of the LLM. By training lightweight probes on the target model's internal representations, SwitchSD identifies genuine copy-intent with high precision (AUC > 0.99). This allows the system to dynamically switch between neural drafting (e.g., EAGLE) and context-based copying. Our results across Llama and Qwen families demonstrate throughput gains of up to 15% over state-of-the-art baselines like EAGLE3, effectively turning copying from a noisy heuristic into a principled, model-aware decoding regime.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Speculative decoding, one of 12 directions in Efficient LLM inference and serving. Builds on 22 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Sep 2026.
Builds on
22 of 25 references.
Closest ancestors · 8
Same direction, newest first
- 2025BanditSpec: Adaptive Speculative Decoding via Bandit Algorithms21 May
- 2025RASD: Retrieval-Augmented Speculative Decoding5 Mar
- 2025EAGLE-3: Scaling up Inference Acceleration of Large Language Models via Training-Time Test3 Mar
- 2025CopySpec: Accelerating LLMs with Speculative Copy-and-Paste Without Compromising Quality13 Feb
- 2024SAM Decoding: Speculative Decoding via Suffix Automaton16 Nov
- 2024EAGLE: Speculative Sampling Requires Rethinking Feature Uncertainty26 Jan
- 2023Accelerating Large Language Model Decoding with Speculative Sampling2 Feb
- 2022Fast Inference from Transformers via Speculative Decoding30 Nov
Other references · 14
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
- 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,928
- 2017Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networkscited by 1,281
- 2015Teaching Machines to Read and Comprehendcited by 1,039
- 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 679
- 2023In-Context Learning Creates Task Vectorscited by 302
- 2024From Decoding to Meta-Generation: Inference-time Algorithms for Large Language Modelscited by 136
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Judge Decoding: Faster Speculative Sampling Requires Going Beyond Model Alignment
- 2025Speculative Decoding: Performance or Illusion?
- 2026Learning to Draft: Adaptive Speculative Decoding with Reinforcement Learning
- 2025AdaSD: Adaptive Speculative Decoding for Efficient Language Model Inference
- 2025Steering Pretrained Drafters during Speculative Decoding
- 2026Multi-Drafter Speculative Decoding with Alignment Feedback
- 2025When, What, and How: Rethinking Retrieval-Enhanced Speculative Decoding
- 2026D^2SD: Accelerating Speculative Decoding with Dual Diffusion Draft Models