mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Open-vocabulary 3D object detection with promptable segmentation

arXiv 2609.19358 ↗First posted 16 Sep 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Three-dimensional object detection for autonomous driving is dominated by detectors trained on large corpora of human-annotated 3D boxes. Such a detector learns a fixed category list, and everything outside it is invisible. This paper asks whether the task can be solved training-free and open-vocabulary. A promptable segmentation model (SAM3), queried with class names as text prompts, supplies instance masks in the vehicle's six surround-view cameras, and the masks are turned into metric 3D boxes using the geometry of the scene. The core is a controlled three-stage comparison on nuScenes in which 2D detection is held fixed and only the source of 3D geometry changes. Geometry predicted from images alone reaches 0.183 mean average precision (mAP) under the official protocol; fitting boxes from raw LiDAR points inside the same masks with training-free rules reaches 0.298 mAP / 0.348 nuScenes detection score (NDS) at zero labeling cost; borrowing supervised box geometry at inference time lifts the same detections to 0.413 mAP / 0.555 NDS, which locates the pipeline's largest deficit in measurement precision rather than 2D detection, while class confusion and confidence calibration survive that substitution. Reversing the direction, a three-state camera-witness rule built from the same masks improves a supervised LiDAR-only detector from 0.596 to 0.630 mAP, roughly half the gain of fully supervised camera fusion, with no training. A coverage analysis shows that SAM3 finds 84% of in-range objects with a correctly named mask; the classes that fail in the official metric are misnamed or geometrically unforgiving, not unseen.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2026.

Builds on

19 of 28 references.

References · 19

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,523
  3. 2023Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detectioncited by 3,332
  4. 2018PointPillars: Fast Encoders for Object Detection from Point Cloudscited by 1,715
  5. 2023DUSt3R: Geometric 3D Vision Made Easycited by 1,567
  6. 2017VoxelNet: End-to-End Learning for Point Cloud Based 3D Object Detectioncited by 1,323
  7. 2022BEVFormer: Learning Bird's-Eye-View Representation from Multi-Camera Images via Spatiotemporal Transformerscited by 1,218
  8. 2020Center-based 3D Object Detection and Trackingcited by 1,144
  9. 2021Open-vocabulary Object Detection via Vision and Language Knowledge Distillationcited by 906
  10. 2022BEVFusion: Multi-Task Multi-Sensor Fusion with Unified Bird's-Eye View Representationcited by 850
  11. 2021DETR3D: 3D Object Detection from Multi-view Images via 3D-to-2D Queriescited by 658
  12. 2022Detecting Twenty-thousand Classes using Image-level Supervisioncited by 614
7 more
  1. 2022OpenScene: 3D Scene Understanding with Open Vocabulariescited by 559
  2. 2019PointPainting: Sequential Fusion for 3D Object Detectioncited by 449
  3. 2021FCOS3D: Fully Convolutional One-Stage Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 447
  4. 2023CLIP2Scene: Towards Label-efficient 3D Scene Understanding by CLIPcited by 181
  5. 2021Multimodal Virtual Point 3D Detectioncited by 166
  6. 2023Open-Vocabulary Point-Cloud Object Detection without 3D Annotationcited by 81
  7. 2026DVGT-2: Vision-Geometry-Action Model for Autonomous Driving at Scalecited by 13

Built on by

Not cited yet.