mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Causal-History Test-Time Scaling for Failure Recovery in Autoregressive World-Action Models

arXiv 2609.18016 ↗First posted 16 Sep 2026cs.ROcited by 1

On the map: World models → Embodied and robot world models

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

World-action models (WAMs) have emerged as a promising paradigm for robot manipulation by jointly modeling future visual dynamics and robot actions. However, existing WAMs are trained predominantly on successful trajectories, making them prone to failure when real-world execution diverges from the learned dynamics. This issue is amplified in autoregressive WAMs, where execution errors become part of the causal history and continue to influence subsequent predictions. To this end, we introduce method, a training-free framework that reformulates failure recovery as test-time scaling over causal histories. This formulation decomposes recovery into three coupled decisions: when to revise the causal history, where to recover a reliable history prefix, and which history configuration best supports subsequent execution. Specifically, method realizes these decisions through three stages: 1) Progress-Aware Recovery Trigger detects persistent non-progress and triggers recovery only when the current execution state permits intervention; 2) History-Prefix Recovery identifies the unreliable history suffix, retrieves a historical anchor matching the current physical state, and reconstructs the causal KV state from the retained prefix while conditioning on the latest real observation; and 3) Hypothesis Verification compares the future continuations induced by complete-history, recovered-prefix, and full-reset hypotheses, and commits the best-supported hypothesis. Experiments in both simulated and real-world manipulation settings demonstrate consistent improvements in task success, while ablations confirm the contribution of each recovery stage.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Embodied and robot world models, one of 11 directions in World models. Builds on 10 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2026.

Builds on

10 of 36 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026AHA-WAM:Asynchronous Horizon-Adaptive World-Action Modeling with Observation-Guided Context Routing8 Jun
  2. 2026Is the Future Compatible? Diagnosing Dynamic Consistency in World Action Models8 May
  3. 2026Fast-WAM: Do World Action Models Need Test-time Future Imagination?17 Mar
  4. 2026World Action Models are Zero-shot Policies17 Feb

Other references · 6

  1. 2022RT-1: Robotics Transformer for Real-World Control at Scalecited by 2,061
  2. 2024Video Prediction Policy: A Generalist Robot Policy with Predictive Visual Representationscited by 289
  3. 2026ABot-M0: VLA Foundation Model for Robotic Manipulation with Action Manifold Learningcited by 103
  4. 2025Steering Vision-Language-Action Models as Anti-Exploration: A Test-Time Scaling Approachcited by 21
  5. 2026RedFlow: Redirect Failure into Action-Level Corrections for Flow-matching VLA Policycited by 4
  6. 2026SAIL: Test-Time Scaling for In-Context Imitation Learning with VLMcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Long-WAM: Scaling the Context of World-Action Models
  2. 2026Rethink Before You Execute: Adaptive Execution for World Action Models
  3. 2026Test-Time Scaling for World Action Models via Zero-Shot Geometric Evaluation
  4. 2026FACT: Failure-Aware Causal Training for World-Action Models
  5. 2026World Models Dream of Success: Diagnosing and Repairing Failure Insensitivity in Robot World Models
  6. 2026RM-WAM: Reliable Memory-Augmented World Action Models for Long-Horizon Robot Manipulation
  7. 2026DIM-WAM: World-Action Modeling with Diverse Historical Event Memory
  8. 2026Future Anchored Verification and Online Recovery for World Action Models