Compute-Optimal Pretrain--Fine-tune in Ridge Gradient Descent
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Pretraining followed by fine-tuning introduces a compute-allocation problem: under a fixed training budget, compute spent improving the upstream objective reduces the compute available for downstream adaptation. Despite its practical importance, this trade-off is not yet well understood theoretically, even in simple models. In this paper, we cast this allocation as a compute-split problem under a two-stage pretrain--fine-tune procedure with fixed total optimisation budget, using regularised least squares trained by gradient descent as a tractable setting. We characterise the optimal split under data-dependent evaluation geometries induced by the fine-tuning problem. Our results show that the allocation depends on how pretraining directions affect fine-tuning predictions and how fine-tuning shifts are seen through downstream data geometry. In particular, the relevant quantities are determined by prediction-relevant spectral components of the pretraining and fine-tuning empirical covariances. Technically, the analysis relies on a basis-invariant, eigenspace-level spectral decomposition, together with perturbative control of the non-commuting pretraining and fine-tuning dynamics.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2026.
Builds on
22 of 30 references.
References · 22
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,236
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
- 2022LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applicationscited by 1,220
- 2022Editing Models with Task Arithmeticcited by 1,120
- 2013Exact solutions to the nonlinear dynamics of learning in deep linear neural networkscited by 763
- 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 739
- 2021Scaling Laws for Transfercited by 272
- 2024When Scaling Meets LLM Finetuning: The Effect of Data, Model and Finetuning Methodcited by 204
- 2022Delta Tuning: A Comprehensive Study of Parameter Efficient Methods for Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 180
- 2018A Continuous-Time View of Early Stopping for Least Squarescited by 69
10 more
- 20244+3 Phases of Compute-Optimal Neural Scaling Lawscited by 68
- 2024Scaling Laws for Downstream Task Performance of Large Language Modelscited by 49
- 2022The Power and Limitation of Pretraining-Finetuning for Linear Regression under Covariate Shiftcited by 26
- 2023On the Provable Advantage of Unsupervised Pretrainingcited by 22
- 2021A Theoretical Analysis of Fine-tuning with Linear Teacherscited by 17
- 2025Functional Scaling Laws in Kernel Regression: Loss Dynamics and Learning Rate Schedulescited by 17
- 2024Training Compute-Optimal Protein Language Modelscited by 12
- 2024Amuro and Char: Analyzing the Relationship between Pre-Training and Fine-Tuning of Large Language Modelscited by 9
- 2025Risk Comparisons in Linear Regression: Implicit Regularization Dominates Explicit Regularizationcited by 8
- 2025Predicting kernel regression learning curves from only raw data statisticscited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.