mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Assessing nnU-Net Generalization across Brain Tumor Populations in BraTS-GoAT 2026

arXiv 2609.15524 ↗First posted 14 Sep 2026cs.CV eess.IVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

BraTS-GoAT evaluates tumor segmentation across heterogeneous populations. We trained a conventional 3D nnU-Net on 1,351 labeled cases using five-fold cross-validation and 1,000 epochs per fold. The final predictor averaged all folds and applied test-time mirroring. On pooled official validation, global DSC values were 0.7805, 0.8288, and 0.8854 for enhancing tumor (ET), tumor core (TC), and whole tumor (WT). Under matched fold-0 inference, mean regional Dice decreased from 0.9058 on source out-of-fold (OOF) cases to 0.8310 on pooled validation (difference--0.0747). Mirroring gave small single-fold gains but no clear ensemble benefit; a residual-encoder alternative reached 0.8282 mean Dice. In labeled OOF predictions, failure cases had substantially smaller reference ET volumes; after adjustment for ET and WT volume, lower Dice remained associated with more disconnected ET components and a smaller fraction of ET contained in the largest component.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2026.

Builds on

5 of 11 references.

References · 5

  1. 2021The RSNA-ASNR-MICCAI BraTS 2021 Benchmark on Brain Tumor Segmentation and Radiogenomic Classificationcited by 518
  2. 2022Metrics reloaded: Recommendations for image analysis validationcited by 195
  3. 2023The ASNR-MICCAI Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) Challenge 2023: Intracranial Meningiomacited by 53
  4. 2025PSAT: Pediatric Segmentation Approaches via Adult Augmentations and Transfer Learningcited by 1
  5. 2026Lost in the Folds: When Cross-Validation Is Not a Deep Ensemble for Uncertainty Estimationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.