mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Pre-PEFT Probing: Weight Statistics and Perturbation Robustness for Layer Selection in VLM Vision Encoders

arXiv 2609.15229 ↗First posted 14 Sep 2026cs.CV cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose a pre-fine-tuning probing method for Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) layer selection, aiming to obtain more stable and higher gains with fewer trainable parameters when adapting large vision--language models (VLMs). Unlike the common practice of applying LoRA and other adapters to all layers at once---where layer selection often relies on heuristic rules---we focus on the vision encoder and directly evaluate the "adaptability'' of each Transformer layer. Specifically, we characterize each layer from two perspectives: (i) the statistical properties of its Q/K/V projection weights (e.g., norms and condition numbers); (ii) robustness under controlled parameter perturbations. We then systematically compare these indicators with the downstream performance gains brought by applying PEFT to a single layer. Across experiments covering seven benchmarks and five PEFT variants, we observe a consistent correlation: layers (or matrices) with larger weight norms and higher condition numbers are usually more robust to perturbations and are more likely to yield larger fine-tuning gains. These results show that distribution-statistics analysis and perturbation tests before fine-tuning can provide practical signals for adaptation-layer selection, thereby maintaining or improving performance while reducing trainable parameters.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2026.

Builds on

28 of 32 references.

References · 28

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  5. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,869
  6. 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,587
  7. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,236
  8. 2023InternVL: Scaling up Vision Foundation Models and Aligning for Generic Visual-Linguistic Taskscited by 2,565
  9. 2023MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?cited by 2,141
  10. 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,120
  11. 2022Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answeringcited by 1,919
  12. 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,681
16 more
  1. 2022ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoningcited by 1,479
  2. 2024Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?cited by 914
  3. 2023A Survey on Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 909
  4. 2022Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context Learningcited by 896
  5. 2023Vision-Language Models for Vision Tasks: A Surveycited by 839
  6. 2023LLaMA-Adapter: Efficient Fine-tuning of Language Models with Zero-init Attentioncited by 781
  7. 2023HallusionBench: An Advanced Diagnostic Suite for Entangled Language Hallucination and Visual Illusion in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 583
  8. 2023OpenFlamingo: An Open-Source Framework for Training Large Autoregressive Vision-Language Modelscited by 565
  9. 2024Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 525
  10. 2018Rethinking ImageNet Pre-trainingcited by 377
  11. 2023VeRA: Vector-based Random Matrix Adaptationcited by 300
  12. 2022Chart-to-Text: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Chart Summarizationcited by 169
  13. 2021Screen2Words: Automatic Mobile UI Summarization with Multimodal Learningcited by 120
  14. 2022CLEVR-Math: A Dataset for Compositional Language, Visual and Mathematical Reasoningcited by 120
  15. 2024Reproducibility Study on Adversarial Attacks Against Robust Transformer Trackerscited by 3
  16. 2024Investigating and unmasking feature-level vulnerabilities of CNNs to adversarial perturbationscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Rethinking Fine-Tuning: Unlocking Hidden Capabilities in Vision-Language Models
  2. 2026Rethinking Model Selection in VLM Through the Lens of Gromov-Wasserstein Distance
  3. 2025PEFT A2Z: Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning Survey for Large Language and Vision Models
  4. 2024Layer-wise Alignment: Examining Safety Alignment Across Image Encoder Layers in Vision Language Models
  5. 2023Black-Box Tuning of Vision-Language Models with Effective Gradient Approximation
  6. 2025Rethinking Few-Shot Adaptation of Vision-Language Models in Two Stages
  7. 2026What Makes VLMs Robust? Towards Reconciling Robustness and Accuracy in Vision-Language Models
  8. 2024An Empirical Study of Parameter Efficient Fine-tuning on Vision-Language Pre-train Model