mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Follow the Geometry, Not the Model: Cold Start Semi-Supervised Learning

arXiv 2609.14451 ↗First posted 13 Sep 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Modern semi-supervised learning (SSL) couples pseudo-label generation and classifier training, using the classifier's own confidence to select the pseudo-labels that are then used to update the model. In the cold-start regime, where at most a few labels per class are available, this coupling is ill-posed, since the classifier cannot supervise itself before it has learned. To address this problem, we propose VAST (Veracity-Aware Semi-Supervised Training), which decouples these two stages. Probabilistic beliefs over the unlabeled set are first inferred directly from the geometry of a frozen self-supervised embedding and only then distilled into an inductive classifier. The construction rests on the Veracity Matrix, a kernel-based structure that aggregates label evidence across the data manifold and admits an interpretation as a Dirichlet posterior under a per-observation powered-likelihood model. Additionally, we introduce Veracity Propagation, a self-terminating belief-spreading step that extends coverage beyond the kernel neighborhood of the labeled set. Under a controlled protocol in which all methods receive identical frozen embeddings and labeled sets, VAST outperforms the strongest graph-based SSL baselines at every operating point across three datasets, with statistically significant gains in 7 of 9 comparisons, while producing a deployable inductive classifier rather than requiring transductive graph inference. Compared with end-to-end confidence-gated SSL, we further find that these methods underperform in this setting and, in our experiments, do not consistently exceed labeled-only performance.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Sep 2026.

Builds on

21 of 35 references.

References · 21

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  3. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
  4. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
  5. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,080
  6. 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,818
  7. 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,390
  8. 2020Big Self-Supervised Models are Strong Semi-Supervised Learnerscited by 1,375
  9. 2019Contrastive Multiview Codingcited by 1,297
  10. 2019Unsupervised Data Augmentation for Consistency Trainingcited by 1,057
  11. 2016Temporal Ensembling for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,054
  12. 2018Predict then Propagate: Graph Neural Networks meet Personalized PageRankcited by 987
9 more
  1. 2021FlexMatch: Boosting Semi-Supervised Learning with Curriculum Pseudo Labelingcited by 537
  2. 2020Principal Neighbourhood Aggregation for Graph Netscited by 477
  3. 2019Label Propagation for Deep Semi-supervised Learningcited by 287
  4. 2020Combining Label Propagation and Simple Models Out-performs Graph Neural Networkscited by 199
  5. 2020CoMatch: Semi-supervised Learning with Contrastive Graph Regularizationcited by 167
  6. 2022SimMatch: Semi-supervised Learning with Similarity Matchingcited by 118
  7. 2020Poisson Learning: Graph Based Semi-Supervised Learning At Very Low Label Ratescited by 49
  8. 2022In Defense of Core-set: A Density-aware Core-set Selection for Active Learningcited by 26
  9. 2021Barely-Supervised Learning: Semi-Supervised Learning with very few labeled imagescited by 17

Built on by

Not cited yet.