Physics-enriched neural solvers for transient ice-flow simulation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Transient glacier simulations with higher-order ice flow require the repeated solution of a nonlinear problem as the geometry evolves. In the online mode of the Instructed Glacier Model, the velocity field is represented by a neural network whose weights are warm-started from the previous time step and updated with a few optimizer iterations. We show that supplying the network with inexpensive input fields derived from low-order ice-flow balances improves this online solver. Unlike residual-based physics-informed neural networks, which incorporate physics through governing-equation penalties in the loss, our approach leaves the governing energy objective unchanged, adding physical structure through the network inputs. Across three real-world glacier configurations, the enriched solver is markedly more robust to solver settings. On the two alpine cases, it also improves the tuned accuracy--runtime trade-off, reducing surface-velocity errors by factors of two to four at fixed runtime and reaching few-percent relative errors with only 104--105 trainable parameters, far fewer than comparable raw-input baselines. A 300-year Aletsch simulation then completes in under one minute, and the larger Valais domain in about two minutes, on a single GPU---a budget once reserved for much simpler shallow-ice models. Gains are smaller for the fast marine-terminating glacier, where nonlocal stress coupling favors larger or spectral networks. More broadly, the results suggest that enriching a neural solver's inputs with reduced-order physics can make repeated higher-order solves much cheaper, with no training data and no offline training.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Sep 2026.
Builds on
19 of 45 references.
References · 19
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
- 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,501
- 2020Fourier Features Let Networks Learn High Frequency Functions in Low Dimensional Domainscited by 2,200
- 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 2,018
- 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,341
- 2017DGM: A deep learning algorithm for solving partial differential equationscited by 678
- 2021Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networkscited by 643
- 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 634
- 2017The Deep Ritz method: A deep learning-based numerical algorithm for solving variational problemscited by 583
- 2021Machine learning accelerated computational fluid dynamicscited by 471
- 2020hp-VPINNs: Variational Physics-Informed Neural Networks With Domain Decompositioncited by 236
7 more
- 2020Solver-in-the-Loop: Learning from Differentiable Physics to Interact with Iterative PDE-Solverscited by 205
- 2019Learning Neural PDE Solvers with Convergence Guaranteescited by 77
- 2022Neural Galerkin Schemes with Active Learning for High-Dimensional Evolution Equationscited by 56
- 2021Evolutional Deep Neural Networkcited by 50
- 2023Multi-stage Neural Networks: Function Approximator of Machine Precisioncited by 48
- 2025Improving Energy Natural Gradient Descent through Woodbury, Momentum, and Randomizationcited by 13
- 2022Performance portable ice-sheet modeling with MALIcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.