VRL-Bench: Benchmarking agents on computer control tasks under finite trial budgets

Learning from trial and error is a promising way to improve language agents on complex tasks such as computer control. Reflexion introduced verbal reinforcement learning, which turns failed trials into text that guides later attempts without updating model parameters. We introduce VRL-Bench, a harness for fair evaluation of trial-and-error learning under finite trial budgets. Across three models on MiniWoB and WebShop, we evaluate updates from several prominent verbal-memory methods spanning Reflexion and later work: each improves observed success over memory-free retry in some settings but reduces it in others. Replay experiments show that using reflection can reduce success rates, revealing a trade-off between exploiting experience and continued exploration. We propose VEX2, a verbal exploration--exploitation scheduler that uses a language model to jointly select policies and allocate the remaining trial budget. VEX2 is the only evaluated update to achieve positive observed success-rate gains over retry in all six settings.