mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Soft Symbol Grounding for Prototypical Concepts

arXiv 2609.12247 ↗First posted 10 Sep 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neuro-symbolic models are usually trained with supervision only on final labels, leaving the intermediate concepts unobserved. Since many concept assignments are consistent with a given label, training can predict labels correctly while recovering the wrong concepts, a failure known as a reasoning shortcut. Prototypical networks reduce shortcuts by anchoring each concept to a few labeled examples, but existing methods still couple perception and reasoning through a hand-crafted, task-specific differentiable loss that must be redesigned for every task. We introduce Soft-PNet, which removes this loss: it reframes concept grounding as a Metropolis walk over a precomputed cache of feasible symbolic solutions, guided by a prototype distribution built from a single labeled anchor per concept, and trains against one KL objective between the prototype-weighted cache and the network's concept predictions. The objective is identical across tasks and remains applicable when the solution space cannot be enumerated. On textttMNIST-EvenOdd, Visual Sudoku, and textttKand-Logic under scarce supervision, Soft-PNet matches loss-engineered prototypical networks at the concept and label levels and recovers concepts that soft-grounding baselines miss, with no loss engineering and lower training time.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2026.

Builds on

19 of 25 references.

References · 19

  1. 2017Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learningcited by 3,015
  2. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
  3. 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,032
  4. 2019Neural Probabilistic Logic Programming in DeepProbLogcited by 394
  5. 2019The Neuro-Symbolic Concept Learner: Interpreting Scenes, Words, and Sentences From Natural Supervisioncited by 372
  6. 2020Logic Tensor Networkscited by 199
  7. 2019SATNet: Bridging deep learning and logical reasoning using a differentiable satisfiability solvercited by 173
  8. 2019Neural-Symbolic Computing: An Effective Methodology for Principled Integration of Machine Learning and Reasoningcited by 151
  9. 2022Semantic Probabilistic Layers for Neuro-Symbolic Learningcited by 103
  10. 2020Explainable Object-induced Action Decision for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 88
  11. 2023Not All Neuro-Symbolic Concepts Are Created Equal: Analysis and Mitigation of Reasoning Shortcutscited by 63
  12. 2020Closed Loop Neural-Symbolic Learning via Integrating Neural Perception, Grammar Parsing, and Symbolic Reasoningcited by 58
7 more
  1. 2024BEARS Make Neuro-Symbolic Models Aware of their Reasoning Shortcutscited by 37
  2. 2023Neuro-Symbolic Continual Learning: Knowledge, Reasoning Shortcuts and Concept Rehearsalcited by 33
  3. 2024Interpretable Concept-Based Memory Reasoningcited by 17
  4. 2019Kandinsky Patternscited by 16
  5. 2024Softened Symbol Grounding for Neuro-symbolic Systemscited by 16
  6. 2022PROTOtypical Logic Tensor Networks (PROTO-LTN) for Zero Shot Learningcited by 3
  7. 2025Right for the Right Reasons: Avoiding Reasoning Shortcuts via Prototypical Neurosymbolic AIcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.