A variational physics-informed graph neural network for heterogeneous solid mechanics
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Stress localization in heterogeneous solids is governed by the bimaterial interface, where the displacement field remains C0-continuous, while in-plane stresses jump due to the stiffness mismatch. Coordinate-based physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) represent this jump via a prescribed regularization width or a weighted interface penalty, making their accuracy sensitive to how phase-contrast changes are handled. This work presents a variational, label-free physics-informed graph neural network (PI-GNN) in which the heterogeneity is carried by the discretization rather than by the trial field. The solver operates on a conforming adaptive mesh graph, assigns constitutive behavior per element, and minimizes the discrete total potential energy as a single unweighted objective in which only first derivatives appear. The discrete energy on piecewise-linear elements coincides with the finite element (FE) Ritz functional. Dirichlet conditions are enforced by construction, with no penalty term, no interface weight, and no prescribed transition width. Using one fixed architecture, optimizer, and loss across small-strain elasticity and finite-strain Neo-Hookean hyperelasticity in two and three dimensions, the von Mises error remains below 3.58% across a stiffness-contrast sweep spanning (Einc/Emat∈[10-2,102]), where a strong-form PINN degrades to 5.58%, and its displacement error reaches 7.66% against 0.49% for the PI-GNN. A trained network halves the (σxx) error of an energy-based PINN (5.01% versus 10.94%). Training cost exceeds a single FE solve by more than an order of magnitude, so the construction is a variationally consistent, penalty-free interface representation for parametric surrogates and inverse identification rather than a replacement for a one-off FE analysis.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2026.
Builds on
14 of 44 references.
References · 14
- 2022Scientific Machine Learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's nextcited by 608
- 2020hp-VPINNs: Variational Physics-Informed Neural Networks With Domain Decompositioncited by 236
- 2019An Energy Approach to the Solution of Partial Differential Equations in Computational Mechanics via Machine Learning: Concepts, Implementation and Applicationscited by 118
- 2021Physics-informed graph neural Galerkin networks: A unified framework for solving PDE-governed forward and inverse problemscited by 102
- 2021Physics informed neural networks for continuum micromechanicscited by 46
- 2020A Physics-Guided Neural Network Framework for Elastic Plates: Comparison of Governing Equations-Based and Energy-Based Approachescited by 34
- 2022A mixed formulation for physics-informed neural networks as a potential solver for engineering problems in heterogeneous domains: comparison with finite element methodcited by 33
- 2021The mixed deep energy method for resolving concentration features in finite strain hyperelasticitycited by 28
- 2020Meshless physics-informed deep learning method for three-dimensional solid mechanicscited by 27
- 2024A review of graph neural network applications in mechanics-related domainscited by 14
- 2024Physics-informed MeshGraphNets (PI-MGNs): Neural finite element solvers for non-stationary and nonlinear simulations on arbitrary meshescited by 12
- 2022On the use of graph neural networks and shape-function-based gradient computation in the deep energy methodcited by 10
Built on by
Not cited yet.