MUC-FL: Block-Wise Marginal Utility Contribution for Communication-Efficient Federated Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated Learning (FL) enables distributed model training without centralizing data but suffers from high communication overhead. To address this, we propose Block-Wise Marginal Utility Contribution (MUC), a framework that selectively transmits only the most impactful data blocks based on their contribution to model performance. To evaluate our framework, we apply it to a multimodal dataset integrated from multiple MIMIC clinical datasets and show that only 24 out of 1,135 candidate blocks (1.76%) carry meaningful improvement signals, enabling a potential communication reduction of 45-50% while maintaining or improving model quality. Our deduplication-based block selection achieves a macro F1 score of 0.8566 compared to 0.8155 for standard federated optimization, demonstrating that selective transmission can improve performance, particularly in underrepresented classes.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2026.
Builds on
20 of 26 references.
References · 20
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
- 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,475
- 2023LLaVA-Med: Training a Large Language-and-Vision Assistant for Biomedicine in One Daycited by 1,305
- 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 629
- 2019MIMIC-CXR-JPG, a large publicly available database of labeled chest radiographscited by 597
- 2017Deep Gradient Compression: Reducing the Communication Bandwidth for Distributed Trainingcited by 478
- 2018Sparsified SGD with Memorycited by 376
- 2018Not All Samples Are Created Equal: Deep Learning with Importance Samplingcited by 328
- 2020Client Selection in Federated Learning: Convergence Analysis and Power-of-Choice Selection Strategiescited by 198
- 2020A Principled Approach to Data Valuation for Federated Learningcited by 127
8 more
- 2022Client Selection in Federated Learning: Principles, Challenges, and Opportunitiescited by 62
- 2020To Talk or to Work: Flexible Communication Compression for Energy Efficient Federated Learning over Heterogeneous Mobile Edge Devicescited by 46
- 2021Communication Efficiency in Federated Learning: Achievements and Challengescited by 40
- 2018Finding Influential Training Samples for Gradient Boosted Decision Treescited by 15
- 2021Hierarchical Federated Learning based Anomaly Detection using Digital Twins for Smart Healthcarecited by 15
- 2022Serving Deep Learning Models with Deduplication from Relational Databasescited by 15
- 2025Privacy and Accuracy-Aware AI/ML Model Deduplicationcited by 2
- 2025SecureFed: A Two-Phase Framework for Detecting Malicious Clients in Federated Learningcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.