Beyond Conventional Federated Learning via High-Order Regularization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated clients that perform several local optimization steps can return parameter displacements with widely different magnitudes. The quadratic regularization of FedProx grows linearly with displacement and therefore offers limited control over the contrast between ordinary and unusually large client movements. We here introduce HiFedProx, which replaces the quadratic penalty with a scale-matched power-type regularizer indexed by p≥2. All powers have the same regularization-gradient magnitude at a reference displacement R, while every p>2 gives a weaker response below R and a stronger response above it. An exact affine reference calculation shows that increasing p compresses relative displacement disparities, although very large powers approach fixed-radius behavior and increase local curvature. HiFedProx combines this geometry with finite-budget stochastic client optimization and same-minibatch Armijo backtracking. In paired five-seed experiments on a frozen 60-writer FEMNIST subset, a common-parameter study over p∈2,3,4,5,6,7,8 shows similar clean-training performance but substantial gains under composite stress. The lowest moderate- and severe-stress losses occur at p=7 and p=6, improving over p=2 by 11.44% and 23.16%, respectively. Although displacement-tail ratios continue to decrease through p=8, predictive performance peaks in an intermediate range and Armijo trial cost increases with p. These results indicate that the exponent should be calibrated rather than maximized. In our experiments, p=5--7 provides the most useful range.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2026.
Builds on
11 of 19 references.
References · 11
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,987
- 2020Tackling the Objective Inconsistency Problem in Heterogeneous Federated Optimizationcited by 906
- 2020Personalized Federated Learning with Moreau Envelopescited by 618
- 2021Understanding Clipping for Federated Learning: Convergence and Client-Level Differential Privacycited by 69
- 2022FedVARP: Tackling the Variance Due to Partial Client Participation in Federated Learningcited by 64
- 2021High-order methods beyond the classical complexity bounds, I: inexact high-order proximal-point methodscited by 3
- 2025Moreau envelope and proximal-point methods under the lens of high-order regularizationcited by 2
- 2025ItsDEAL: Inexact two-level smoothing descent algorithms for weakly convex optimizationcited by 1
- 2025Asymptotic Convergence Analysis of High-Order Proximal-Point Methods Beyond Sublinear Ratescited by 1
- 2026Robust Learning Meets Quasar-Convex Optimization: Inexact High-Order Proximal-Point Methodscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.