uFlowCSP: Crystal Structure Prediction using Mean flow generative models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Crystal structure prediction (CSP) is fundamental to computational materials discovery. Generative models including CDVAE, DiffCSP, FlowMM, and CrystalFlow learn stable-crystal distributions directly, but diffusion and flow-matching inference requires tens to thousands of sequential network evaluations per candidate. We introduce uFlowCSP, a MeanFlow-based CSP model that learns the average, rather than instantaneous, probability-flow velocity. It generates a complete structure in one to five evaluations, delivering 5x-58x faster inference with equal or better performance. A chemistry- and symmetry-aware Transformer uses canonical atom ordering, global composition, and per-token chemistry embeddings. A coarse crystal-system token is used only during training; it provides additive gains, particularly improving space-group agreement despite being absent at inference, which remains formula-only. On MP-20 with 20 candidates per target, one step matches CrystalFlow (78.38% vs. 78.34%) with 100x fewer evaluations and about 10x lower wall-clock time. Five steps reach 83.64%, exceeding CrystalFlow (78.34% at 2,000 evaluations) and DiffCSP (77.93% at about 20,000), while using 20x fewer evaluations. uFlowCSP generates 10,000 structures in 0.39-1.31 minutes, versus 6.5 for CrystalFlow and 76.1 for DiffCSP. Under CSPBench's energy-ranked top-five structure-and-space-group criterion, five-step uFlowCSP reaches 72%/72%/65% structure, space-group, and consensus match rates. CrystalFlow reaches 78%/73%/68% at 100 steps but falls to 49%/32%/31% at five. Thus, uFlowCSP improves accuracy per network evaluation, not merely peak accuracy.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2026.
Builds on
11 of 34 references.
References · 11
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2025Mean Flows for One-step Generative Modelingcited by 524
- 2021Crystal Diffusion Variational Autoencoder for Periodic Material Generationcited by 268
- 2023Crystal Structure Prediction by Joint Equivariant Diffusioncited by 142
- 2024FlowMM: Generating Materials with Riemannian Flow Matchingcited by 105
- 2024Space Group Constrained Crystal Generationcited by 71
- 2025SymmCD: Symmetry-Preserving Crystal Generation with Diffusion Modelscited by 48
- 2024Space Group Informed Transformer for Crystalline Materials Generationcited by 40
- 2025WyckoffDiff -- A Generative Diffusion Model for Crystal Symmetrycited by 25
- 2025All that structure matches does not glittercited by 10
- 2026Multimodal Crystal Flow: Any-to-Any Modality Generation for Unified Crystal Modelingcited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026EP-Flow: Disordered Crystal Structure Prediction without Site-Level Annotations
- 2026MolCrystalFlow: Molecular Crystal Structure Prediction via Flow Matching
- 2026OrgFlow: Generative Modeling of Organic Crystal Structures from Molecular Graphs
- 2025CrystalFormer-CSP: Thinking Fast and Slow for Crystal Structure Prediction
- 2026DMFlow: Disordered Materials Generation by Flow Matching
- 2026OMatG-flash: An All-Atom Flow Map with Reinforce Adjoint Matching for Scalable Materials Discovery
- 2026Fast Organic Crystal Structure Prediction with Unit Cell Flow Matching
- 2026Deep Generative Crystal Structure Prediction: A Benchmark Study and a Controlled Test of Prototype Dependence