mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

uFlowCSP: Crystal Structure Prediction using Mean flow generative models

arXiv 2609.09799 ↗First posted 9 Sep 2026cond-mat.mtrl-sci cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Crystal structure prediction (CSP) is fundamental to computational materials discovery. Generative models including CDVAE, DiffCSP, FlowMM, and CrystalFlow learn stable-crystal distributions directly, but diffusion and flow-matching inference requires tens to thousands of sequential network evaluations per candidate. We introduce uFlowCSP, a MeanFlow-based CSP model that learns the average, rather than instantaneous, probability-flow velocity. It generates a complete structure in one to five evaluations, delivering 5x-58x faster inference with equal or better performance. A chemistry- and symmetry-aware Transformer uses canonical atom ordering, global composition, and per-token chemistry embeddings. A coarse crystal-system token is used only during training; it provides additive gains, particularly improving space-group agreement despite being absent at inference, which remains formula-only. On MP-20 with 20 candidates per target, one step matches CrystalFlow (78.38% vs. 78.34%) with 100x fewer evaluations and about 10x lower wall-clock time. Five steps reach 83.64%, exceeding CrystalFlow (78.34% at 2,000 evaluations) and DiffCSP (77.93% at about 20,000), while using 20x fewer evaluations. uFlowCSP generates 10,000 structures in 0.39-1.31 minutes, versus 6.5 for CrystalFlow and 76.1 for DiffCSP. Under CSPBench's energy-ranked top-five structure-and-space-group criterion, five-step uFlowCSP reaches 72%/72%/65% structure, space-group, and consensus match rates. CrystalFlow reaches 78%/73%/68% at 100 steps but falls to 49%/32%/31% at five. Thus, uFlowCSP improves accuracy per network evaluation, not merely peak accuracy.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2026.

Builds on

11 of 34 references.

References · 11

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  2. 2025Mean Flows for One-step Generative Modelingcited by 524
  3. 2021Crystal Diffusion Variational Autoencoder for Periodic Material Generationcited by 268
  4. 2023Crystal Structure Prediction by Joint Equivariant Diffusioncited by 142
  5. 2024FlowMM: Generating Materials with Riemannian Flow Matchingcited by 105
  6. 2024Space Group Constrained Crystal Generationcited by 71
  7. 2025SymmCD: Symmetry-Preserving Crystal Generation with Diffusion Modelscited by 48
  8. 2024Space Group Informed Transformer for Crystalline Materials Generationcited by 40
  9. 2025WyckoffDiff -- A Generative Diffusion Model for Crystal Symmetrycited by 25
  10. 2025All that structure matches does not glittercited by 10
  11. 2026Multimodal Crystal Flow: Any-to-Any Modality Generation for Unified Crystal Modelingcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026EP-Flow: Disordered Crystal Structure Prediction without Site-Level Annotations
  2. 2026MolCrystalFlow: Molecular Crystal Structure Prediction via Flow Matching
  3. 2026OrgFlow: Generative Modeling of Organic Crystal Structures from Molecular Graphs
  4. 2025CrystalFormer-CSP: Thinking Fast and Slow for Crystal Structure Prediction
  5. 2026DMFlow: Disordered Materials Generation by Flow Matching
  6. 2026OMatG-flash: An All-Atom Flow Map with Reinforce Adjoint Matching for Scalable Materials Discovery
  7. 2026Fast Organic Crystal Structure Prediction with Unit Cell Flow Matching
  8. 2026Deep Generative Crystal Structure Prediction: A Benchmark Study and a Controlled Test of Prototype Dependence