OntoKG-EQ: A provenance-grounded, competency-question-governed knowledge graph for auditable analyst querying
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Analysts in emerging equity markets keep answering the same questions. Did fundamentals match the market's response? How does the local currency co-move with returns? Which firms outperform sector and benchmark, and which disclosures coincide with abnormal trading? These answers come from ad-hoc spreadsheets that are hard to reproduce, audit, or trust. We present OntoKG-EQ, a knowledge-based system that makes such queries reproducible, evidence-linked, temporally explicit, valid, and inspectable. It couples a bounded, competency-question-governed core ontology with a provenance-aware knowledge graph in which every class, property, shape, and metric is justified by one of five frozen questions. The system materialises market data into the graph, computes the metrics, validates its structure against declarative shape constraints, answers each competency question with a graph query, derives typed findings, and generates an explanation tracing each result to its observations, evidence, sources, and provenance. We evaluate on curated datasets from three emerging markets (Pakistan, Malaysia, Indonesia). Once each market's data is mapped into the common schema, the ontology, shapes, queries, and rules are reused unchanged. A relational-database baseline shows the graph changes no analytics. Its value is governance, provenance, and self-explaining structure. Because answers are rendered deterministically from the validated graph, their consistency with it is guaranteed by construction. Used as a reference, the system measures how consistently eight open language models transcribe the same evidence (provenance coverage 0.00 to 1.00). A study with a 17-participant convenience panel finds the evidence bundle significantly increased perceived trust and completeness. Code and data are openly released.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Sep 2026.
Builds on
13 of 40 references.
References · 13
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,075
- 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 973
- 2020A Survey on Knowledge Graphs: Representation, Acquisition and Applicationscited by 643
- 2020Knowledge Graphscited by 621
- 2024Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Surveycited by 324
- 2024ReDeEP: Detecting Hallucination in Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 101
- 2024HybridRAG: Integrating Knowledge Graphs and Vector Retrieval Augmented Generation for Efficient Information Extractioncited by 93
- 2024Think-on-Graph 2.0: Deep and Faithful Large Language Model Reasoning with Knowledge-guided Retrieval Augmented Generationcited by 64
- 2023An Experiment in Retrofitting Competency Questions for Existing Ontologiescited by 12
- 2025KGRAG-Ex: Explainable Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Knowledge Graph-based Perturbationscited by 4
- 2025FinKario: Event-Enhanced Automated Construction of Financial Knowledge Graphcited by 4
1 more
- 2025Interpretable Question Answering with Knowledge Graphscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.