mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

DeepTable: Structural Attention Biases and Tree Path Encoding for Hierarchical Table Understanding

arXiv 2609.07707 ↗First posted 7 Sep 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance in table understanding. However, they typically process table content and headers as linearized token sequences. This representation weakens the two-dimensional and hierarchical structural relationships encoded by multi-level row and column headers. Existing parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods incorporate basic row and column information but do not explicitly capture the rich structural dependencies induced by hierarchical table headers. We propose DeepTable, a structure-aware approach for table understanding with LLMs. DeepTable comprises two complementary components. Structural Attention Bias (SAB) introduces learnable biases into the attention logits to explicitly represent whether pairs of table tokens share the same row or column. Tree Path Encoding (TPE) represents each table token using the ancestor paths of its row and column headers, preserving its position within the multi-level table structure. We integrate DeepTable with TableLoRA (He et al., 2025) to inject structural information into parameter-efficient adaptation. Across three LLM backbones, DeepTable consistently improves the corresponding TableLoRA baselines on three table question answering benchmarks, achieving average gains of 7.42 points on HiTab, 3.23 points on WikiTQ, and 2.01 BLEU points on FeTaQA. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed structural biases across different LLM backbones.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Sep 2026.

Builds on

17 of 24 references.

References · 17

  1. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  2. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
  3. 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,799
  4. 2021Train Short, Test Long: Attention with Linear Biases Enables Input Length Extrapolationcited by 1,103
  5. 2015Compositional Semantic Parsing on Semi-Structured Tablescited by 515
  6. 2020TAPAS: Weakly Supervised Table Parsing via Pre-trainingcited by 434
  7. 2019TabFact: A Large-scale Dataset for Table-based Fact Verificationcited by 428
  8. 2015Improved Semantic Representations From Tree-Structured Long Short-Term Memory Networkscited by 306
  9. 2024Chain-of-Table: Evolving Tables in the Reasoning Chain for Table Understandingcited by 188
  10. 2021FeTaQA: Free-form Table Question Answeringcited by 175
  11. 2019HIBERT: Document Level Pre-training of Hierarchical Bidirectional Transformers for Document Summarizationcited by 121
  12. 2021HiTab: A Hierarchical Table Dataset for Question Answering and Natural Language Generationcited by 118
5 more
  1. 2020TUTA: Tree-based Transformers for Generally Structured Table Pre-trainingcited by 100
  2. 2022TableFormer: Robust Transformer Modeling for Table-Text Encodingcited by 91
  3. 2024TableLLM: Enabling Tabular Data Manipulation by LLMs in Real Office Usage Scenarioscited by 77
  4. 2021MATE: Multi-view Attention for Table Transformer Efficiencycited by 54
  5. 2024StructLM: Towards Building Generalist Models for Structured Knowledge Groundingcited by 29

Built on by

Not cited yet.