mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Open Tabular Insight Extraction: Where Do We Stand, and Where Should We Go?

arXiv 2609.07629 ↗First posted 7 Sep 2026cs.IR cs.AI cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Democratizing access to the knowledge held in large corpora of tables such as data lakes is emerging as a central research challenge. Research in this space is advancing and broadening in scope, increasingly supplying the components to satisfy a person's insight need end-to-end. Yet these efforts remain fragmented across communities that frame the problem under their own conventions, such as table question answering, text-to-SQL, and data analysis agents, with works six times as likely to cite within the same task label as across labels. To bring these communities onto common ground, we establish a holistic framework for this pursuit, which we refer to as Open Tabular Insight Extraction (OpenTI). We formalize OpenTI from first principles around the analytical knowledge a person needs, the procedure for deriving it from a corpus of tables, and how well a result serves the person who sought it. In doing so we consolidate frameworks and terminology across information retrieval, natural language processing, machine learning, databases, and human-computer interaction, and apply this grounding in a systematic review and analysis of systems and benchmarks that work towards OpenTI. We find that current systems do not cover the end-to-end scope of OpenTI, mainly focusing on the analysis itself, and that benchmarks are largely unfit for evaluations in an open setting as inputs presuppose knowledge of tables, and validation mechanisms do not match the setup. Finally, we distill a research agenda towards OpenTI systems, evaluation, and interaction paradigms that surface the insights users need. An interactive companion to our paper is available at https://open-tabular-insight-extraction.github.io.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 315 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Sep 2026.

Builds on

38 of 315 references.

References · 38

  1. 2020CodeBLEU: a Method for Automatic Evaluation of Code Synthesiscited by 479
  2. 2024MLE-bench: Evaluating Machine Learning Agents on Machine Learning Engineeringcited by 469
  3. 2023Cognitive Architectures for Language Agentscited by 429
  4. 2025TabICL: A Tabular Foundation Model for In-Context Learning on Large Datacited by 289
  5. 2024AI Agents That Mattercited by 219
  6. 2023Large Language Models are Versatile Decomposers: Decompose Evidence and Questions for Table-based Reasoningcited by 178
  7. 2024CHASE-SQL: Multi-Path Reasoning and Preference Optimized Candidate Selection in Text-to-SQLcited by 138
  8. 2025Deep Research Agents: A Systematic Examination And Roadmapcited by 128
  9. 2024TableGPT2: A Large Multimodal Model with Tabular Data Integrationcited by 72
  10. 2024Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) and Beyond: A Comprehensive Survey on How to Make your LLMs use External Data More Wiselycited by 66
  11. 2025DataSciBench: An LLM Agent Benchmark for Data Sciencecited by 57
  12. 2025DABstep: Data Agent Benchmark for Multi-step Reasoningcited by 46
26 more
  1. 2024BEAVER: An Enterprise Benchmark for Text-to-SQLcited by 42
  2. 2025A Survey on Large Language Model Benchmarkscited by 36
  3. 2023User Simulation for Evaluating Information Access Systemscited by 31
  4. 2025Pneuma: Leveraging LLMs for Tabular Data Representation and Retrieval in an End-to-End Systemcited by 23
  5. 2025Large Language Model-based Data Science Agent: A Surveycited by 23
  6. 2025DAComp: Benchmarking Data Agents across the Full Data Intelligence Lifecyclecited by 23
  7. 2025Goal Alignment in LLM-Based User Simulators for Conversational AIcited by 21
  8. 2025LLM/Agent-as-Data-Analyst: A Surveycited by 16
  9. 2025Causal-Copilot: An Autonomous Causal Analysis Agentcited by 15
  10. 2022End-to-End Table Question Answering via Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 14
  11. 2024PoTable: Towards Systematic Thinking via Plan-then-Execute Stage Reasoning on Tablescited by 14
  12. 2025DAgent: A Relational Database-Driven Data Analysis Report Generation Agentcited by 13
  13. 2023Conversational Challenges in AI-Powered Data Science: Obstacles, Needs, and Design Opportunitiescited by 9
  14. 2026CausalReasoningBenchmark: A Real-World Benchmark for Disentangled Evaluation of Causal Identification and Estimationcited by 6
  15. 2025Birdie: Natural Language-Driven Table Discovery Using Differentiable Search Indexcited by 5
  16. 2025Table Question Answering in the Era of Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey of Tasks, Methods, and Evaluationcited by 5
  17. 2024RETQA: A Large-Scale Open-Domain Tabular Question Answering Dataset for Real Estate Sectorcited by 4
  18. 2025Pandora: A Code-Driven Large Language Model Agent for Unified Reasoning Across Diverse Structured Knowledgecited by 4
  19. 2025Empowering Tabular Data Preparation with Language Models: Why and How?cited by 4
  20. 2025REaR: Retrieve, Expand and Refine for Effective Multitable Retrievalcited by 4
  21. 2025Reasoning about Intent for Ambiguous Requestscited by 4
  22. 2026LatentRefusal: Latent-Signal Refusal for Unanswerable Text-to-SQL Queriescited by 3
  23. 2026Efficient Table Retrieval and Understanding with Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 3
  24. 2025Navigating Pitfalls: Evaluating LLMs in Machine Learning Programming Educationcited by 2
  25. 2026Decomposition-Driven Multi-Table Retrieval and Reasoning for Numerical Question Answeringcited by 2
  26. 2026TopBench: A Benchmark for Implicit Predictive Reasoning in Tabular Question Answeringcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.